Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:55:57.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the U.S. and Soviet Strategic Threat1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2016

Glenn Hastedt
Glenn Hastedt*
Affiliation:
James Madison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Courses on international relations, U.S. foreign policy, Soviet foreign policy, and national security policy spend a great deal of time exploring the question of the Soviet or U.S. strategic threat. For all of its centrality to these courses, students often have, difficulty dealing with the issue in anything other than a gut feeling manner. In part, this is due to the highly technical and complex nature of the subject matter, but it is also due to the passive manner in which students are exposed to the subject. This essay presents one way of actively engaging students in the learning process, forcing them to formulate and defend their own view in the form of an individually or collectively produced intelligence estimate.

Understanding why U.S. (Soviet) policy makers see a Soviet (U.S.) threat requires an understanding of the process by which threats are established. The most formal and authoritative U.S. government statements on the dimensions of the Soviet strategic threat are found in national intelligence estimates (NIE's). Typically, the intelligence estimating process is broken down into six functional steps: 1) requirement setting, 2) collection, 3) processing, 4) analysis, 5) reporting, and 6) receipt and evaluation by the consumer (Ransom 1970). NIE's are only one kind of finished intelligence produced by the intelligence community. There is no fixed length or format for an intelligence estimate to follow. The Senator Mike Gravel edition of the Pentagon Papers (1971) presents a number of estimates on Vietnam that can be used by students as models. Ransom (1970) presents a handy checklist of questions that students as consumers can use to evaluate estimates.

Type
For the Classroom
Information
The Political Science Teacher , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Winter 1989 , pp. 11 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

This is an abbreviated version of a paper presented at the 1987 conference on Nuclear War and Peace Education, George Mason University, October 1987.

References

Allison, G., et al. 1985. Hawks, Doves, & Owls. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bamford, J. 1982. The Puzzle Palace. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, B. 1985. Intelligence in the Organizational Context. Orbis 29: 571–596.Google Scholar
Bracken, P. 1983. The Command and Control of Nuclear Forces. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Calder, N. 1979. Nuclear Nightmares. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 1978. American and Soviet Military Trends. Washington, DC: The Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Craig, P. and Jungerman, J.. 1986. Nuclear Arms Race. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Daugherty, W., et al. 1986. Civilian Casualties from “Limited” Nuclear Attacks on the United States. International Security 10:3–45.Google Scholar
Davis, L. and Schilling, W.. 1973. All You Ever Wanted to Know about MIRV and ABM Calculations but Were Not Cleared to Ask. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17:207–242.Google Scholar
Dyson, F. 1984. Weapons and Hope. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P., et al. 1984. The Cold and The Dark. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ermath, F. 1978. Contrasts in American and Soviet Strategic Thought. International Security 3:138–55.Google Scholar
Freedman, L. 1986. U.S. Intelligence and the Soviet Strategic Threat. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gravel, M., ed. 1971. The Senator Gravel Edition—The Pentagon Papers. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Haley, P., et al. 1985. Nuclear Strategy, Arms Control, and the Future. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Harris, J. and Markusen, E., eds. 1986. Nuclear Weapons and the Threat of Nuclear War. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Harvard Study Group. 1983. Living with Nuclear Weapons. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Holzman, F. 1982. Soviet Military Spending: Assessing the Numbers Game. International Security 6:78–101.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. 1976. The Fate of Facts in a World of Men. New York: Foreign Policy Association, Headline Series, #233.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. 1984. The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kolkowicz, R. and Micklewicz, E.. 1986. The Sowet Calculus of Nuclear War. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lee, W. 1977. Understanding the Soviet Military Threat. New York: National Strategy Information Center.Google Scholar
Levi, B., et al. 1987/1988. Civilian Casualties from “Limited” Nuclear Attacks on the Soviet Union. International Security 12:165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, A., et al. 1985. Intelligence: Policy and Process. Boulder: West-view.Google Scholar
Miller, S., ed. 1984. Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. 1980. The Effects of Nuclear War. Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun & Co.Google Scholar
Predos, J. 1986. The Soviet Estimate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, P. and Arkin, W.. 1983. S.I.O.P. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ransom, H. 1970. The Intelligence Establishment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richelson, J. 1985. The U.S. Intelligence Community. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. 1983. The Origins of Overkill. International Security 7:3–71.Google Scholar
Sagan, C. 1954. Nuclear War and Climatic Catastrophe. Foreign Affairs 62:257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, H. and Scott, W.. 1981. The Armed Forces of the USSR. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Sivard, R. 1986. World Military and Social Expenditures, 1986. Washington, DC: World Priorities.Google Scholar
Smoke, R. 1987. National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma, 2d ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Snow, D. 1987. National Security. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Soviet Military Power (annual). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Whence the Threat to Peace. 1984. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar