Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:47:30.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tale of Two Feminisms in International Relations? Feminist Political Economy and the Women, Peace and Security Agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Jacqui True
Jacqui True*
Affiliation:
Monash University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A photo depicting Russian President Vladimir Putin in chivalrous fashion, placing his coat around the shoulders of China's first lady at an Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) dinner made headline news around the world in November 2014 (Allen-Ebrahimian 2014). Surely this is not the serious stuff of international politics, IR colleagues commented in social media forums? But from a feminist perspective that pays attention to the pervasive gendering of IR, the image was not at all surprising or trivial. Indeed, the gender symbolism of the image reveals the patriarchal foundations of international politics. Putin, for his part, personifies the linkages between the figure of the male provider—at the heart of global economic governance and meetings like APEC—and the figure of the male protector of “womenandchildren” (Enloe 1993)—at the heart of the security state system.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 419 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany. 2014. “Putin Hits on China's First Lady.” Foreign Policy, November 10.Google Scholar
Bruff, Ian. 2014. “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26 (1): 113–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2005. “Primed for Violence.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 161–78.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara, and True, Jacqui. 2015. “The Pandemic of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence and the Political Economy of Gender Inequality.” In Rape Justice, ed. Powell, A.. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2010. Seriously: Crises and Crashes as if Women Mattered. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a Global Scale. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, ed. 1992. Gendered States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Stark, Alex. 2013 “Cynthia Enloe—Interview.” E-IR, March 13. http://www.e-ir.info/2013/03/13/interview-cynthia-enloe/ (accessed December 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2012. The Political Economy of Violence against Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turshen, Meredith. 1998. What Women Do in Wartime: Gender and Conflict in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO). 2005. Multi-Country Study Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection.” Signs 29 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar