Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-28T04:37:27.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building Theory and Making Change: The Challenges of Studying Feminist Activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Rose Corrigan
Rose Corrigan*
Affiliation:
Drexel University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the last twenty years, my research has focused on the ways that legal, medical, and community organizations respond to sexual violence in the United States. This research has been informed and, I believe, enriched by my work in local organizations that provide supportive services to survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence and to those seeking access to abortion. When I arrived at Rutgers for graduate school, I was surprised and frustrated at how few of the stories I heard as a service provider had made their way into the academic discussions about feminism, feminist movements, and feminist organizations that I encountered in the political science literature.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 489 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bevacqua, Maria. 2000. Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristen. 2008. In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement against Sexual Violence. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coker, Donna. 2001. “Crime Control and Feminist Law Reform in Domestic Violence Law: A Critical Review.” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 4 (2): 801–60.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Rose. 2013. Up Against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Rebellion and Quiescence in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Aya. 2009. “Rape, Feminism, and the War on Crime.” Washington Law Review 84 (4): 581–658.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1995. “What is the Feminist Movement?” In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, eds. Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Jenny. 1996. “The Violence Against Women Act and the Construction of Multiple Consciousness in the Civil Rights and Feminist Movements.” Journal of Law & Policy 4: 463.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth. 2000. Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Andrea. 2005. Native American Feminism, Sovereignty, and Social Change. Feminist Studies 31 (1): 116–32.Google Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, and Tellis, Katharine. 2012. “The Criminal Justice System's Response to Sexual Violence.” Violence Against Women 18 (2): 169–92.Google Scholar