Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:05:43.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experience, Knowledge, and Political Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

Peter Allen Open the ORCID record for Peter Allen [Opens in a new window]
Peter Allen*
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence suggests that increasing the descriptive representation of groups improves their substantive representation. What underpins this link? Many scholars writing on the subject stop short of arguing explicitly that it is “shared experience” within groups. I argue that we should embrace the potential conceptual and empirical benefits of framing representation through experience. To do this, we should think of experience specifically in terms of the epistemic content and capacities gained through subjective experience, which can allow individuals to think about the world in distinct ways. I reframe the idea that experiences might be shared within groups and ameliorate concerns that the concept is essentialist, drawing out the political relevance of my argument. This has the strategic implication that we should be unafraid to argue in favor of political presence on the basis of (shared) experience and the empirical implication that future research should consider subjective experience more closely.

Keywords

Political representationdescriptive representationsubstantive representationexperienceshared experience
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 1112 - 1140
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to Fran Amery, Sarah Childs, Sophia Hatsizavvidou, Joni Lovenduski, David S. Moon, Deivi Norberg, Jessica C. Smith, Rebecca Wainwright, Ana Catalano Weeks, and audience members at Birkbeck, University of London and the University of Bath for comments and discussion on previous drafts of this article. I would also like to thank the three anonymous reviewers at Politics & Gender for their extremely helpful feedback during the peer review process, which greatly improved the manuscript.

References

REFERENCES

Agarwal, Bina. 2009. “Rule Making in Community Forestry Institutions: The Difference Women Make.” Ecological Economics 68 (8–9): 2296–2308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Peter. 2017. “Transformative Experiences in Political Life.” Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (4): e40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 2005. The Ethics of Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashton, Natalie Alana, and McKenna, Robin. 2020. “Situating Feminist Epistemology.” Episteme 17 (1): 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, Mark, and Wille, Anchrit. 2017. Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalano, Ana. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cath, Yuri. 2019. “Knowing What It Is Like and Testimony.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1): 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2012. “The Substantive Representation of Women: What to Do with Conservative Claims?” Political Studies 60 (1): 213–25.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Childs, Sarah. 2018. “Conservatism and Women's Political Representation.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, Mandy, Moffatt, Suzanne, Addison, Michelle, and Wiseman, Alice. 2019. “Impact of Universal Credit in North East England: A Qualitative Study of Claimants and Support Staff.” BMJ Open 9 (7): e029611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs: Women Representing Women. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. “Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44 (2): 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Withey, Julie. 2006. “The Substantive Representation of Women: The Case of the Reduction of VAT on Sanitary Products.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1990. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Leyenaar, Monique, eds. 2013. Breaking Male Dominance in Old Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly, Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen's Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Josefina, and Verge, Tània. 2020. “Gender, Power and Privilege in the Parliamentary Workplace.” Parliamentary Affairs. Published October 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa048.Google Scholar
Espírito-Santo, Ana, Freire, André, and Serra-Silva, Sofia. 2020. “Does Women's Descriptive Representation Matter for Policy Preferences? The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 26 (2): 227–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 1999. “Epistemic Oppression and Epistemic Privilege.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (Suppl. 1): 191–210.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. 2013. “Epistemic Justice as a Condition of Political Freedom?” Synthese 190 (7): 1317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gains, Francesca, and Lowndes, Vivien. 2018. “Gender, Actors, and Institutions at the Local Level: Explaining Variation in Policies to Address Violence against Women and Girls.” Governance 31 (4): 683–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Marc. 2018. “Committee Hearings of the UK Parliament: Who Gives Evidence and Does This Matter?” Parliamentary Affairs 71 (2): 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1982. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1986. “What Mary Didn't Know.” Journal of Philosophy 83 (5): 291–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, Devin, and Och, Malliga. 2014. “Talking about My Generation and Class? Unpacking the Descriptive Representation of Women in Asian Parliaments.” Women's Studies International Forum 47 (Part A): 168–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1988. “What Experience Teaches.” In Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology, by Lewis, David, 262–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Loar, Brian. 1990. “Phenomenal States.” Philosophical Perspectives 4: 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2012. “Prime Minister's Questions as Political Ritual.” British Politics 7 (4): 314–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2015. “Should Workers Represent Workers?” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (2): 261–70.Google Scholar
Marsh, Sarah. 2018. “MP Breaks House of Commons Taboo by Discussing Her Period.” The Guardian, June 28. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jun/28/danielle-rowley-breaks-house-of-commons-taboo-discussing-period (accessed September 8, 2021).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” In Mortal Questions, by Nagel, Thomas, 165–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
News, BBC. 2018. “MPs Hold Highly-Charged Northern Ireland Abortion Laws Debate.” June 5. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-politics-44377858/mps-hold-highly-charged-northern-ireland-abortion-laws-debate (accessed September 8, 2021).Google Scholar
Nida-Rümelin, Martine. 2009. “Qualia: The Knowledge Argument.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/qualia-knowledge/.Google Scholar
Nugent, Mary K. 2019. “When Does He Speak for She? Men Representing Women in Parliament.” PhD diss., Rutgers University, School of Graduate Studies.Google Scholar
O'Grady, Tom. 2019. “Careerists versus Coal-Miners: Welfare Reforms and the Substantive Representation of Social Groups in the British Labour Party.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (4): 544–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. 2014. Transformative Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. 2017. “De Se Preferences and Empathy for Future Selves.” Philosophical Perspectives 31 (1): 7–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2012. “Representation and Inclusion.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 512–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Tenenbaum, Josh, and Torralba, Antonio. 2012. “One-Shot Learning with a Hierarchical Nonparametric Bayesian Model.” Proceedings of ICML Workshop on Unsupervised and Transfer Learning 27: 195–206.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2012. “What Makes the Substantive Representation of Women Possible in a Westminster Parliament? The Story of RU486 in Australia.” International Political Science Review 33 (3): 320–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarry, Elaine. 1985. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women's Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David Woodruff. 2013. “Phenomenology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/phenomenology/.Google Scholar
Sobolewska, Maria, McKee, Rebecca, and Campbell, Rosie. 2018. “Explaining Motivation to Represent: How Does Descriptive Representation Lead to Substantive Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minorities?” West European Politics 41 (6): 1237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, Kate, and Young, David. 2020. “Universal Simplicity? The Alleged Simplicity of Universal Credit from Administrative and Claimant Perspectives.” Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 28 (2): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michelle L. 2002. The difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. 2017. “Women Representing Women? Evidence from Hong Kong's Semi-Democratic Legislature.” Representation 53 (3–4): 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegmark, Max. 2017. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2000. “Testing the Politics of Presence: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag.” Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2007. “Difference and Social Structure: Iris Young's Critical Social Theory of Gender.” Constellations 14 (2): 280–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar