Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:52:01.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Legislative Performance in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Suraj Jacob
Suraj Jacob*
Affiliation:
Azim Premji University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large literature on the United States and Western Europe establishes that there is a correlation between gender and legislator activity. The article extends the literature to India by exploring a unique dataset of Question Hour activity in the lower house of parliament over a 30-year period (1980–2009). Compared with male legislators, female legislators ask 24% fewer parliamentary questions, and there are also significant differences in question content, even after controlling for important covariates. However, it is likely that female and male legislators differ on unobserved attributes that affect legislative activity. Using the intuition that the gender of winners in close elections between women and men is quasi-randomly determined, the article employs a regression discontinuity design to reestimate the gender effect. The results indicate that gender has zero causal effect on the volume of questions and most types of question content.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 236 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93.Google Scholar
Bird, Karen. 2005. “Gendering Parliamentary Questions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–195.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–79.Google Scholar
Brollo, Fernanda, and Troiano, Ugo. 2012. “What Happens When a Woman Wins a Close Election? Evidence from Brazil.” Working Paper, Department of Economics, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Catalano, Ana. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005–2007.” Politics & Gender 5 (1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Caughey, Devin, and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2011. “Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942–2008.” Political Analysis 19 (4): 385–408.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. Women Representing Women: New Labour's Women MPs. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona L.. 2008. “The Substantive Representation of Women.” In Women and British Party Politics, ed. Childs, Sarah. New York: Routledge, 108–39.Google Scholar
Clots-Figueras, Irma. 2012. “Are Female Leaders Good for Education? Evidence from India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (1): 212–44.Google Scholar
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 448–74.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–97.Google Scholar
Deo, Nandini. 2012a. “Indian Women Activists and Transnational Feminism over the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Women's History 24 (4):149–74.Google Scholar
Deo, Nandini. 2012b. “Running From Elections: Indian Feminism and Electoral Politics.” India Review 11 (1): 46–64.Google Scholar
Desai, Manisha. 2013. “Women's Movements in India.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, ed. Snow, David A., Porta, Donatella Della, Klandermans, Bert, and McAdam, Doug. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernando, and Gyourko, Joseph. 2011. “Does Gender Matter for Political Leadership? The Case of U.S. Mayors.” Working Paper No. 17671, National Bureau of Economic Research,.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T. 2010. “Venus and Mars, or Down to Earth: Stereotypes and Realities of Gender Differences.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (6): 688–92.Google Scholar
Fleschenberg, Andrea. 2004. “Revisiting the Glass Ceiling in Asia—Comments on Feminist Leadership Models.” Project Discussion Paper 3, East Institute for East Asian Studies, University of Duisburg Essen.Google Scholar
Grey, Sandra J. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and Women MPs in the New Zealand House of Representatives.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar
Grunenfelder, Rita, and Baechtiger, Andre. 2007. “Gendered Deliberation? How Men and Women Deliberate in Legislatures.” Presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Haq, Mahbub ul. 2000. Human Development in South Asia 2000: The Gender Question. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A., Hall, Bronwyn H., and Griliches, Zvi. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents–R & D Relationship.” Econometrica 52 (4): 909–38.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Imbens, Guido, and Lemieux, Thomas. 2007. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Working Paper 13039, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Iyer, Lakshmi, Anandi Mani, Prachi Mishra, and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “The Power of Political Voice: Women's Political Representation and Crime in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (4):165–93.Google Scholar
Jacob, Suraj, and Singhal, Naveen. 2010. “Consequences of Women's Electoral Victory: Encouragement, Empowerment, and Entrenchment.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jeydel, Alana, and Taylor, Andrew J.. 2003. “Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Evidence from the U.S. House in the 103rd–105th Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 19–27.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark. 1997. “Legislator Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives.” Policy Studies Journal 5 (4): 613–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3):533–47.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary F. 1978. “Towards Equality? Cause and Consequence of the Political Prominence of Women in India.” Asian Survey 18 (5): 473–86.Google Scholar
Kaushik, Susheela. 1992. “Women and Political Participation.” In Women in Politics: Forms and Processes, ed. Kamala, Sankaran. New Delhi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 35–54.Google Scholar
Kaushik, Susheela. 1998. Participation of Women in Panchayati Raj in India: A Stock Taking. New Delhi: National Commission for Women.Google Scholar
Kishwar, Madhu. 1996. “Women's Marginal Role in Politics.” Manushi 97: 9–21.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Kieth. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona L. 2005. “Competing Claims: Quotas for Women and Minorities in India and France.” Washington University .Mimeo.Google Scholar
Kudva, Neema. 2003. “Engineering Elections: The Experiences of Women in Panchayati Raj in Karnataka, India.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 16 (3): 445–63.Google Scholar
Kumari, Ranjana, and Dubey, Anju. 1994. Women Parliamentarians: A Study in the Indian Context. New Delhi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, David S. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 675–97.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Cornelia. 1994. “Women and Political Leadership in India: Able Politicians or Token Presences?” Asian Studies Review 17 (3): 6–14.Google Scholar
Little, Thomas H., Dunn, Dana, and Deen, Rebecca E.. 2001. “A View from the Top: Gender Differences in Legislative Priorities among State Legislative Leaders.” Women & Politics 22 (4): 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lok Sabha Secretariat. 2003. Indian Parliamentary Companion: Who's Who of Members of Lok Sabha: First to Thirteenth Lok Sabha. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.Google Scholar
Lok Sabha Secretariat. 2004a. Council of Ministers, 1947–2004: Names and Portfolios of the Members of the Union Council of Ministers, from 15 August 1947 to 25 May 2004. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.Google Scholar
Lok Sabha Secretariat. 2004b. Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84–102.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian, and Studlar, Donley. 1992. “Gender and Representation among Legislative Candidates in Australia.” Comparative Political Studies 25 (3): 388–411.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2011. “Internal and External Validity.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, Ramesh Chandra. 2000. Role of Women in Legislatures in India: A Study. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. “Second among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93–118.Google Scholar
Nanivadekar, Medha. 2006. “Are Quotas a Good Idea? The Indian Experience with Reserved Seats for Women.” Politics & Gender 2 (1):119–28.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Green, Jennifer, and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2003. “Women in Parliament, 1945–2003: Cross-National Dataset.” ICPSR 24340-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Kunovich, Sheri, and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 263–84.Google Scholar
Pearson, Gail. 2004. “Tradition, Law and the Female Suffrage Movement in India.” In Women's Suffrage in Asia: Gender, Nationalism and Democracy, ed. Edwards, Louise P. and Roces, Mina. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poggione, Sarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 305–14.Google Scholar
Porter, Jack. 2003. “Estimation in the Regression Discontinuity Model.” Working Paper, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 2011. “Behavioural Consequences Restrictions on Plenary Access: Parliamentary Questions in the Norwegian Storting.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 382–93.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin. 2002. “Class, Caste and Gender Women in Parliament in India.” Update of the case study originally published in Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, Stockholm, International IDEA, 1998.Google Scholar
Randall, Vicky. 2006. “Legislative Gender Quotas and Indian Exceptionalism: The Travails of the Women's Reservation Bill.” Comparative Politics 39 (1): 63–82.Google Scholar
Rozenberg, Oliver, and Martin, Shane. 2011. “Questioning Parliamentary Questions.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 394–404.Google Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 956–68.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–88.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.Google Scholar
Singh, Pitam. 2003. Women Legislators in Indian Politics. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.Google Scholar
Swers, Michelle L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and Heath, Roseanna M.. 2003. “Do Women Legislators Have Different Policy Priorities than Their Male Colleagues? A Critical Case Test.” Women & Politics 24 (4): 77–100.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and David, Sky J.. 2002. “Who Participates and Who Is Seen and Not Heard? Evidence from the Honduran Congress.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 8 (1): 10–36.Google Scholar
Thistlethwaite, Donald L., and Campbell, Donald T.. 1960. “Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex Post Facto Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 51 (6): 309–17.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon. 1998. “Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canada's 35th Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 435–65.Google Scholar
Vega, Arturo, and Firestone, Juanita M.. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 213–22.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 1998. The Other Side of Politics: Women's Representation in the Swedish Riksdag. Göteborg: Statsvetenskapliga Institutionen.Google Scholar
Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (1): 125–34.Google Scholar
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jacob Supplementary Material

Abstract

Download Jacob Supplementary Material(File)
File 14.1 KB