Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:04:10.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender-Trait and Ethnic Biases in Russian Regions: Ethnic Integration, Regional Economies, and Women in Local Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2020

Olga A. Avdeyeva  and
Richard E. Matland
Olga A. Avdeyeva
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago
Richard E. Matland
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under what conditions are voters likely to invoke gender-trait stereotypes and ethnic biases when they evaluate the performance of local political leaders? We test arguments from role congruity and social identity theories and employ intersectional analysis to explore voter reliance on gender-trait stereotypes and ethnic biases across four diverse Russian regions. We find that the structure of the regional economy matters for the reduction of gender-trait stereotypes, while spatial and labor market integration matters for the dissipation of ethnic favoritism in leader evaluation. Our findings have important implications for policy makers aiming to reduce political biases in diverse contexts. On the one hand, we encourage scholars to pay careful attention to stereotypes of underrepresented social groups and evaluate how they can translate into understanding the traits associated with good leadership. On the other hand, we demonstrate that the roots of social biases stem from complex structural phenomena, such as limited labor opportunities for women and minorities, and thus require transformative political and economic changes.

Keywords

Gender-trait biasethnic biasintersectional analysisexperimental surveyRussian regions
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 720 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research is supported by a National Science Foundation grant (ARC #0756122). The authors would like to thank our research partners in the Russian regions for their help in conducting the surveys—Dekabrina Vinokurova, Yury Zhegusov, Erzhena Gylykova, Lyudmila Sandakova, Tatyana Titova, Vyacheslav Kozlov, and Marina Kalinina—as well as our large team of research assistants in each region. This article was one of the last manuscripts that Professor Matland worked on. Richard Matland passed away in August 2018.

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Deborah, and Anderson, Kristie. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avdeyeva, Olga A., and Matland, Richard E.. 2020. “Ethnicity and Voters’ Evaluations of Political Leadership: ‘Lab-in-the-Field’ Experiments in Russian Regions.” Post-Soviet Affairs 36 (1): 83–100.Google Scholar
Avdeyeva, Olga A., Vinokurova, Dekabrina M., and Kugaevsky, Alexandr A.. 2017. “Gender and Local Executive Office in Regional Russia: The Party of Power as a Vehicle for Women's Empowerment?” Post-Soviet Affairs 33 (6): 431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Beaulieu, Emily. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes and Corruption: How Candidates Affect Perceptions of Election Fraud.” Politics & Gender 10 (3): 365–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1983. “Modernization, Ethnic Competition, and the Rationality of Politics in Contemporary Africa.” In State versus Ethnic Claims: African Policy Dilemmas, eds. Rothchild, Donald and Olorunsola, Victor A.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 152–71.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology 38 (2): 279–95.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M. 2018. “Untangling the Relationship between Partisanship, Gender Stereotypes, and Support for Female Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics &Policy 39 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Prejudice?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–1540.Google Scholar
Bem, Sandra. 1974. “The Psychological Measure of Androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42 (2): 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay J., Jamal, Amaney A., and Lust, Ellen. 2015. “Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1979. “In-Group Bias in the Minimal Intergroup Situation: A Cognitive-Motivational Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (2): 307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah J. 2011. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians.” Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Deborah J. 2013. He Runs, She Runs: Why Gender Stereotypes Do Not Harm Women Candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rupert. 2010. Prejudice: Its Social Psychology. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Dittmar, Kelly 2010. “The 2008 Candidate of Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin: Cricking the ‘Highest, Hardest Glass Ceiling.’” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, 2nd ed., eds. Carroll, Susan and Fox, Richard L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 117–43.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Head Counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Deaux, Kay, and Lewis, Laurie. 1984. “Structure of Gender Stereotypes: Interrelationships among Components and Gender Labels.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (5): 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diekman, Amanda B., and Eagly, Alice E.. 2000. “Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (10): 1171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditonto, Tessa. 2017. “A High Bar or a Double Standard? Gender, Competence, and Information in Political Campaigns.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2010. “The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Lynch, Timothy. 2014. “It Takes a Survey: Understanding Gender Stereotypes, Abstract Attitudes, and Voting for Women Candidates.” American Politics Research 42 (4): 656–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Kristin, and Twenge, Jean M.. 2017. “Masculine and Feminine Traits on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory, 1993–2012: A Cross-temporal Meta-Analysis.” Sex Roles 76 (3): 556–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Kam, Cindy. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’” In Cambridge University Press Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. New York: Cambridge University Press, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice E. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice E., and Carli, Linda L.. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about How Women Became Leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice E., and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Ensari, Nurcan, and Murphy, Susan E.. 2003. “Cross-cultural Variations in Leadership Perceptions and Attribution of Charisma to the Leader.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 92 (1–2): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, Joanna, Best, Lisa A., and Gaudet, Derek. 2016. “Candidate Gender, Behavioral Style, and Willingness to Vote: Support for Female Candidates Depends on Conformity to Gender Norms.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (14): 1737–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Miriya R., Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (1): 134–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichino, Nahomi, and Nathan, Noah L.. 2013. “Crossing the Line: Local Ethnic Geography and Voting in Ghana.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 344–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1994. “Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 162–95.Google Scholar
King, David, and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 1999. “Candidate Gender and Assessment of Senate Candidates.” Social Science Quarterly 80 (1): 84–96.Google Scholar
Koenig, Anne M., Eagly, Alice H., Mitchell, Abigail A., and Ristikaru, Tiina. 2011. “Are Leader Stereotypes Masculine? A Meta-analysis of Three Research Paradigms.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (4): 616–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. “Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post–September 11th Era.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Robert G., and Maher, Karen J.. 2002. Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perception and Performance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 2008. “Electoral Systems and the Representation of Ethnic Minorities: Evidence from Russia.” Comparative Politics 40 (3): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, Deborah A., and Carazza, Erica. 2002. “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't Be, Are Allowed to Be, and Do Not Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26 (4): 269–91.Google Scholar
Rosette, Ashleigh S., Leonardelli, Geoffrey J., and Phillips, Katherine W.. 2008. “The White Standard: Racial Bias in Leader Categorization.” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (4): 758–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, Michael L. 2008. “Oil, Islam, and Women.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 107–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russian Federal Statistical Services. 2017. Regional Economic Indicators. [in Russian] https://www.gks.ru/regional_statistics (accessed January 23, 2019).Google Scholar
Schneider, Monica C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2014. “Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 245–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In Organizational Identity: A Reader, eds. Hatch, Mary J. and Schultz, Majken. New York: Oxford University Press, 56–66.Google Scholar
Weldon, Laurel S. 2006. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender.” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 235–48.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Avdeyeva and Matland supplementary material

Avdeyeva and Matland supplementary material

Download Avdeyeva and Matland supplementary material(File)
File 728 KB