Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:04:30.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“New,” “Old,” and “Nested” Institutions and Gender Justice Outcomes: A View from the International Criminal Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2014

Louise Chappell
Louise Chappell*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What difference do new actors and new institutions make to gender justice outcomes? This article explores this question through an examination of the objectives and influence of “new” international actors on the design and implementation of the “new” victims' rights and gender justice provisions contained in the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court's (ICC). Highlighting the role of gender and formal and informal institutions, this article argues that during its first decade in operation, the ICC has produced mixed outcomes in terms of the treatment of victims, especially of conflict-related sexual violence. While there is some sign that the new actors and rules have helped produce some positive outcomes, there are also signs that “old” informal gender rules and the historical context in which the ICC is “nested” has contributed to undermining and distorting news rules aimed at addressing gender injustices. The article suggests that “newness” matters, but so, too, does “oldness” and “nestedness,” and understanding the interaction and relationship between these factors is key to understanding gender justice outcomes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 572 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2010. The Women's Movement Inside and Outside the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. “A Common Language of Gender?” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 128–37.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2010. “Someday My Chance Will Come: Women Contesting for Executive Leadership in West Europe.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Brennan, Deborah. 2012. “The Marketisation of Care: Rationales and Consequences in Liberal and Nordic Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 22 (4): 377–91.Google Scholar
Buss, Doris. 2011. “Performing Legal Order: Some Feminist Thoughts on International Criminal Law.” International Criminal Law Review 11: 409–23.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006a. “Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness.’” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–34.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006b. “Contesting Women's Rights: Charting the Emergence of a Transnational Conservative Patriarchal Network.” Global Society 20 (4): 491–519.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2008. “Governing International Law through the International Criminal Court: A New Site for Gender Justice?” In Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Rai, Shirin M. and Waylen, Georgina. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 160–84.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2010. “Comparative Gender and Institutions: Directions for Research.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 183–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2014. “Conflicting Institutions and the Search for Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 183–96.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2015. The Politics of Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court: Legacies and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise, and Waylen, Georgina. 2013. “Gender and the Hidden Life of Institutions.” Public Administration 91 (3): 599–617.Google Scholar
Coalition for the International Criminal Court (CICC) Budget and Finance Team. 2011. Comments and Recommendations to the Tenth Session of the Assembly of States Parties. November 29.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn W. 2002. Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
De Brouwer, Anne Marie. 2007. “Reparation to Victims of Sexual Violence: Possibilities at the International Criminal Court and at the Trust Fund for Victims and Their Families” Leiden Journal of International Law, 20: 207–37.Google Scholar
Durbach, Andrea, and Chappell, Louise. 2014. “‘Leaving Behind the Age of Impunity’: Victims of Gender Violence and the Promise of Reparations.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16 (4).Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimaging Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Colombia University Press.Glasius, Marlies. 2006. The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1996. “Institutions and their Design.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, ed. Goodin, Robert E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–53.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics. 2 (4): 725–40.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., and Paxton, Pamela. 2008. “Continuous Change, Episodes, and Critical Periods: A Framework for Understanding Women's Political Representation over Time.” Politics & Gender 4 (2): 233–64.Google Scholar
International Criminal Court (ICC). 2006. Regulations of the Registry. ICC-BD/030106.Google Scholar
ICC. 2010a. Review Conference of the Rome Statue: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities.Google Scholar
ICC. 2010b. Stocktaking of International Criminal Justice: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities. RC-2010/RC/11.Google Scholar
ICC. 2011. ICC-01/04-01/06-2744-Red-tENG.Google Scholar
ICC. 2012a. ICC-01/05-01/08-T-220-ENG CT WT 01-05-2012 1/56 NB T.Google Scholar
ICC. 2012b. ICC-01/04-01/06-2842.Google Scholar
ICC. 2012c. ICC-PIDS-CIS-CAR-01-009/12_ENG.Google Scholar
ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP). 2006. Strategic Plan for Outreach of the International Criminal Court. ICC-ASP/5/12. http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/FB4C75CF-FD15-4B06-B1E3-E22618FB404C/185051/ICCASP512_English1.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
ICC ASP. 2012. Report of the Court on the Revised Strategy in Relation to Victims: Past, Present and Future. ICC-ASP/11/40. http://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP11/ICC-ASP-11-40-ENG.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
ICC Office of Public Counsel for Victims (OPCV). 2010. Helping Victims Make their Voice Heard. ICC Doc ICC-OPCV-B-001/10_Eng. http://www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/01A26724-F32B-4BE4-8B02-A65D6151E4AD/282846/LRBookletEng.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Kantola, Johanna. 2006. Feminists Theorize the State. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Karl, Terry Lynn. 1997. The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro States. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and Military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally. 2012. Gender & Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2007. “Gender, Institutions and Power: A Critical Review.” Politics 27: 91–100.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2011. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lauth, H-J. 2000. Informal Institutions and Democracy. Democratization 7 (4): 21–50.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lowndes, Vivien. 2005. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed … How Institutions Change (and Stay the Same) in Local Governance.” Policy Studies 26 (3): 291–309.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2014. “Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): XX–XX.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona, and Waylen, Georgina. 2009. “Critical Perspectives on Feminist Institutionalism.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 237–80.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mertus, Julie. 2004. “Shouting from the Bottom of the Well: The Impact of International Trials for Wartime Rape on Women's Agency.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 6 (1): 110–28.Google Scholar
Mouthaan, Solange. 2011. “The Prosecution of Gender-based Crimes at the ICC: Challenges and Opportunities.” International Criminal Law Review 11 (4): 775–802.Google Scholar
Ni Aolain, Fionnuala, Haynes, Dina, and Cahn, Naomi. 2011. On the Frontlines: Gender, War, and the Post-Conflict Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Odio Benito, Elizabeth. 2014. “Judge Odio Benito: A View of Gender Justice from the Bench.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16 (4).Google Scholar
Olsen, Johan. 2009. “Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 3–32.Google Scholar
Oosterveld, Valerie. 2014. “Constructive Ambiguity and the Meaning of ‘Gender’ for the International Criminal Court.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16 (4).Google Scholar
Pena, Mariana, and Carayon, Gaelle. 2013. “Is the ICC Making the Most of Victim Participation?” The International Journal of Transitional Justice 7 (3): 518–35.Google Scholar
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court . 1998. 2187 UNTS 38544 (entered into force on July 1, 2002).Google Scholar
Rules of Procedure and Evidence. 2002. ICC-ASP/1/3.Google Scholar
SaCouto, Susana. 2012. “Victim Participation in the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: A Feminist Project?” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 18: 297–360.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2008. “Framing Feminists: Market Populism and Its Impact on Public Policy in Australia and Canada.” In Gendering the Nation-State: Canadian and Comparative perspectives, ed. Abu-Laban, Yasmeen. Vancouver: UBC Press, 120–38.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2011. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiff, Benjamin N. 2008. Building the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Victims' Rights Working Group. 2011. The Implementation of Victims' Rights Before the ICC: Issues and Concerns Presented by the Victim's Rights Working Group on the Occasion of the 10th Session of the Assembly of States Parties. http://www.redress.org/downloads/publications/2011_VRWG_ASP10.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2008. “Feminist Perspectives on Transforming Global Governance: Challenges and Opportunities.” In Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Rai, Shirin and Waylen, Georgina. London: Palgrave, 254–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2010. “A Comparative Politics of Gender: Limits and Possibilities.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 223–31.Google Scholar
Women's Initiatives for Gender Justice. 2010. Gender Report Card on the International Criminal Court 2010. http://www.iccwomen.org/news/docs/GRC10-WEB-11-10-v4_Final-version-Dec.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Women's Initiatives for Gender Justice. 2011. Gender Report Card on the International Criminal Court 2011. http://www.iccwomen.org/documents/Gender-Report-Card-on-the-International-Criminal-Court-2011.pdf (accessed February 12, 2014).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chappell Supplementary Material

Chappell Supplementary Material

Download Chappell Supplementary Material(File)
File 13.7 KB