Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:51:13.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Man/Private Woman in Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2015

Arlene W. Saxonhouse
Arlene W. Saxonhouse*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jean Elshtain, in an essay published in Signs in 1982 and entitled “Feminist Discourse and Its Discontents: Language, Power, and Meaning,” addressed one of the many issues with which feminist theorists were then grappling: the oppressive power of language as a tool of control over those who had been silenced throughout history, leaving those wanting to resist that control with the task of discovering new modes of communication. Acknowledging that language has the potential to oppress, Elshtain was, however, not ready to abandon the past, to urge her readers to imagine a world where one could escape the languages and discourses that were bequeathed to us over the generations.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 561 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1984. The Politics. Trans. Lord, Carnes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, Allan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Private Man, Public Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982. “Feminist Discourse and Its Discontents: Language, Power, and Meaning.” Signs 7 (3): 605–21.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1990. Power Trips and Other Journeys: Essays in Feminism and Discourse Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Augustine and the Limits of Politics. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1999. “Public and Private in American Political Life and Thought.” In The Public and the Private in the United States, ed. Abe, Hitoshi, Sato, Hiroko, and Otsuru, Chieko Katagawa. Osaka: Japan Center for Area Studies.Google Scholar
Finley, Moses I. 1973. Democracy: Ancient and Modern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar