Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:27:17.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donor Insemination: Children as In Concreto or In Abstracto Subjects of Rights?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Bartha Maria Knoppers
Bartha Maria Knoppers*
Affiliation:
University of Montreal, Canada
*
Université de Montréal, Faculté de droit, Centre de recherche en droit public, CP. 6128, succursale A, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , August 1993 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bala, N. and Miklas, S. (1992). Rethinking Decisions About Children: Is the “Best Interests of the Child” Approach Really in the Best Interests of Children? Toronto: Policy Research Center on Children and Families.Google Scholar
Bernard, C., Ward, R., and Knoppers, B.M. (1992). “‘Best Interests of the Child’ Exposed: A Portrait of Quebec Custody and Protection Law.” Canadian Journal of Family Law 11:1–93.Google Scholar
Ernst, C. (1986). “Psychosocial Aspects of Artificial Procreation.” In Institut Suisse de droit comparé (dir.), Procréation artificielle, génétique et droit. Zurich: Verlag.Google Scholar
Hill, J.H. (1991). “What Does It Mean to be a ‘Parent’? The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights.” New York University Law Review 66:353–420.Google Scholar
Knoppers, B.M. and Le Bris, S. (1991). “Recent Advances in Medically Assisted Conception: Legal, Ethical and Social Issues.” American Journal of Law and Medicine 4:329–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoppers, B.M. and Le Bris, S. (1993, in preparation). “Ethical and Legal Concerns: Reproductive Technologies ‘90-’93.” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoppers, B.M. and Sloss, E. (1987). “Legislative Reforms in Reproductive Technologies.” Ottawa Law Review 18:663–719.Google Scholar
Le Bris, S. (1988). “Procréations médicalement assistées et parentalité en droit francais et québecois.” , .Google Scholar
Meulders-Klein, M.-T. (1992). “Vie privée, vie familiale et droits de l'homme.” Revue internationalé de droit comparé 4:767–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price Cohen, C. (1983). “The Human Rights of Children.” Capital University Law Review 12:369–403.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies (1993). Survey of Canadian Fertility Programs. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Wald, M.S. (1986). “Children's Rights: A Framework for Analysis.” In Landau, B. (ed.), Children's Rights in the Practice of Family Law. Toronto: Carswell.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992). Recent Advances in Medically Assisted Conception. Geneva.Google Scholar