Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:13:51.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisan politics or public-health need?

An empirical analysis of state choice during initial implementation of the Affordable Care Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2015

Martin Mayer ,
Robert Kenter  and
John C. Morris
Martin Mayer*
Affiliation:
Old Dominion University
Robert Kenter
Affiliation:
Old Dominion University
John C. Morris
Affiliation:
Old Dominion University
*
Correspondence: Martin Mayer, School of Public Service, 2084Constant Hall, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529. Email: mmaye003@odu.edu
Get access

Abstract

States’ policy decisions regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 have often been explained as predominantly, if not solely, partisan. Might rival explanations also apply? Using a cross-sectional 50-state regression model, we studied standard political variables coupled with public-health indicators. This work differs from existing research by employing a dependent variable of five additive measures of ACA support, examining the impact of both political and socioeconomic indicators on state policy decisions. Expanding on recent empirical studies with our more nuanced additive index of support measures, we found that same-party control of a state’s executive and legislative branches was indeed by far the single best predictor of policy decisions. Public-health indicators, overwhelmed by partisan effect, did not sufficiently explain state policy choice. This result does not allay the concerns that health policy has become synonymous with health politics and that health politics now has little to do with health itself.

Keywords

Affordable Care Act (ACA)health care reformMedicaidpartisan politicspolitical conflictstate implementationstate policy choices
Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Fall 2015 , pp. 44 - 51
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rigby, Elizabeth, Clark, Jennifer Hayes, and Pelika, Stacey, “Party politics and enactment of ‘Obamacare’: a policy-centered analysis of minority party involvement,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law , 2014, 39(1): 57–95.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul, Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013), p. 281.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Reinventing American Health Care: How the Affordable Care Act will Improve our Terribly Complex, Blatantly Unjust, Outrageously Expensive, Grossly Inefficient, Error Prone System (New York: PublicAffairs, 2014).Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Schramm, Sanford S., Vartanian, Thomas P., and O’Brien, Erin, “Setting the terms of relief: explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution,” American Journal of Political Science , 2001, 45(2): 378–395.Google Scholar
Farley, Matthew, “Challenging supremacy: Virginia’s response to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” University of Richmond Law Review , 2010, 45(1): 37–80.Google Scholar
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S.__ , 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation, “A guide to the Supreme Court’s decision on the ACA’s Medicaid expansion,” August 2012, https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8347.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. __, 14-114 (2015).Google Scholar
King v. Burwell.Google Scholar
Bagley, Nicholas, “Three words and the future of the Affordable Care Act,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law , 2015, 40(3): 589–597, at p. 596.Google Scholar
Adler, Jonathan H. and Cannon, Michael F., “ King v. Burwell: desperately seeking ambiguity in clear statutory text,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 2015, 40(3): 577–588.Google Scholar
King v. Burwell.Google Scholar
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “March 31, 2015 Effectuated Enrollment Snapshot,” http://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2015-Fact-sheets-items/2015-06-02.html, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
King v. Burwell.Google Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles, “The state politics of Medicaid expansion,” paper presented to the 13th State Politics and Policy Conference (Ames, IA, May 2013).Google Scholar
Mayer, Martin and Kenter, Robert, “Southern discomfort: Medicaid expansion in southern states,” paper presented to the annual meetings of the Southern Political Science Association (New Orleans, LA, January 2014).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation, “Faces of the Medicaid expansion: how obtaining Medicaid coverage impacts low-income adults,” Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, January 1, 2013c, http://kff.org/health-reform/report/faces-of-the-medicaid-expansion-how-obtaining-medicaid-coverage-impacts-low-income-adults/, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. “The impact of current state Medicaid expansion decisions on coverage by race and ethnicity,” Issue brief: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, July 2013d, https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/8450-the-impact-of-current-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation, “The impact of the Medicaid expansion for low-income communities of color across states,” Key facts: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, July 2013e, https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/8435.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
John Holahan, Matthew Buettgens, Caitlin Carroll, and Stan Dorn (Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured), “The cost and coverage implications of the ACA Medicaid expansion: national and state-by-state analysis,” November 2012, https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8384.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation, “Analyzing the impact of state Medicaid expansion decisions,” Issue brief: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, July 2013f, https://kaiserhealthnews.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/8458-analyzing-the-impact-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions2.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Haeder, Simon and Weimer, David, “You can’t make me do it: state implementation of insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act,” Public Administration Review , 2013, 73(S1): 1–14, at p.2.Google Scholar
Haeder and Weimer, 2013.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark A., “States’ decisions not to expand Medicaid,” North Carolina Law Review , 2013, 92: 1459–1477.Google Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth, State resistance to “ObamaCare”, The Forum, 2012, 10(2). doi:10.1515/1540-8884.1501.Google Scholar
Haeder, Simon F. and Weimer, David L., “You can’t make me do it, but I could be persuaded: a Federalism perspective on the Affordable Care Act,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 2015, 40(2): 281–323.Google Scholar
Emanuel.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R and Callaghan, Timothy, “Why states expand Medicaid: Party, resources, and history,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 2013, 38(5): 1023–1050.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lilliard E. and Yilmazer, Tansel, “Understanding the impact of health reform on the states: expansion of coverage through Medicaid and exchanges,” Journal of Consumer Affairs , 2013, 47(2): 191–218.Google Scholar
Plein, Christopher L., A turbulent opposition: the ACA and the South,” August 2014, http://www.rockinst.org/aca/pdf/2014-08-Southern_States_Overview.pdf, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Brill, Stephen, “Bitter Pill,” Time , 2013, 181: 16–55.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Health Data 2012: U.S. Health care System from an International Perspective (Washington, DC: OECD, 2012).Google Scholar
Brill, Stephen, America’s Bitter Pill: Money, Politics, Backroom Deals, And The Fight To Fix Our Broken Health Care System (New York: Brill Journalism Enterprises–Random House, 2015), p. 528.Google Scholar
Rigby.Google Scholar
Jacobs and Callaghan.Google Scholar
Jacobs and Callaghan.Google Scholar
Barrilleaux, Charles and Rainey, Chuck, “The politics of need examining governors’ decisions to oppose the ‘Obamacare’ Medicaid expansion,” State Politics & Policy Quarterly , 2014, 14(4): 437–460.Google Scholar
Haeder and Weimer, 2015.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures, “State laws and actions challenging certain health reforms,” September 1, 2015, http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-laws-and-actions-challenging-ppaca.aspx, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
PoliData, “Party Control Project,” 2013, http://www.polidata.org/party/default.htm, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
United Health Foundation, “America’s health rankings,” 2014, http://www.americashealthrankings.org/reports/, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau, “American Community Survey (ACS),” 2012, http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/2012_release/, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L., “Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93,” American Journal of Political Science , 1998, 42(1): 327–348.Google Scholar
PoliData, “Party Control Project,” 2013, http://www.polidata.org/party/default.htm, accessed October 26, 2015.Google Scholar
PoliData, “Party Control Project.”Google Scholar
Berry et al.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau, “American Community Survey (ACS).”Google Scholar
United Health Foundation.Google Scholar
Clynch, Edward J., “A critique of Ira Sharkansky’s ‘The Utility of Elazar’s Political Culture’,” Polity , 1972, 5(1): 139–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar