Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:00:19.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selling Reproductive Rights: Policy Issues in Surrogate Motherhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Janna C. Merrick
Janna C. Merrick*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN 56301
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles and Commentaries
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: The Politics of Surrogacy Contracts , February 1990 , pp. 161 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, L. (1988). “Feminism Revisited: Fallacies and Policies in the Surrogacy Debate.” Logos 9:81–96.Google Scholar
Annas, G. (1986). “The Baby Broker Boom.” Hastings Center Report 16(3):30–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, G. (1987) “Baby M: Babies (and Justice) for Sale.” Hastings Center Report 17(3):13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arditti, R. (1987). “The Surrogacy Business.” Social Policy 18(2):42–46.Google Scholar
Capron, A. (1987). “Alternative Birth Technologies: Legal Challenges.” University of California, Davis, Law Review 20:679–704.Google Scholar
Carbone, J. (1988). “The Limits of Contract Family Law: An Analysis of Surrogate Motherhood.” Logos 9:147–160.Google Scholar
Corea, G. (1985). The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cummings, S. (1989). Attorney for Mario Haros. Telephone interview, June 12.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972)Google Scholar
Field, M. (1987). “Surrogate Motherhood—The Legal Issues.” New York Law School Human Rights Annual 4:481–553.Google Scholar
Frederick, W. et al. (1987). “HIV Testing of Surrogate Mothers.” The New England Journal of Medicine 317, 21(November 19):1351–1352.Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Heyl, B. (1988). “Commercial Contracts and Human Connectedness.” Society 25, 3(March/April):11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, S. L. and Holt, R. J. (1987). “Redefining Procreation: Facing the Issues.” Population Bulletin 42(3):24–35.Google Scholar
In the Matter of Baby M 537 A.2d 1227 (N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
Kane, E. (1988). Birth Mother. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kane, E. (1989b). “Perspectives on Surrogacy: Risks, Rewards, and Personal Choices.” NOVA Law Review 13(2):487–490.Google Scholar
Krimmel, H. T. (1988). “Surrogate Mother Arrangements from the Perspective of the Child.” Logos 9:97–112.Google Scholar
Merrick, J. C. (1989). “In the Matter of Baby M: Implications for Surrogacy in the U.S.” In Bartels, D., et al. (eds.), Beyond Baby M: Ethical Issues in New Reproductive Techniques. Clifton, N.J.: Humana Press.Google Scholar
National Committee for Adoption (1987). “Surrogate Parenting Issue and NCFA's Activities.” National Adoption Reports 8(1):1–6.Google Scholar
National Coalition Against Surrogacy. “Abuses in Surrogacy.” (Information sheet).Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures (1989). “Bill Introductions in 1989 Legislative Sessions Relating to Surrogacy Contracts.” April 12.Google Scholar
New York State Task Force on Life and the Law (1988). Surrogate Parenting: Analysis and Recommendations for Public Policy.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. U.S. Congress (1988). Infertility: Medical and Social Choices. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Overvold, A. Z. (1988). Surrogate Parenting. New York: Pharos.Google Scholar
Parker, P. J. (1983). “Motivation of Surrogate Mothers: Initial Findings.” American Journal of Psychiatry 140(1):117–118.Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. (1987a). “Surrogacy: A Question of Values.” Conscience 8(3):1–4.Google Scholar
Rothman, B. K. (1987b). “Reproductive Technology and the Commodification of Life.” Women and Health 13:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).Google Scholar
“Surrogate Mother Needed” (1988). USA Today. September 2, p. 5D.Google Scholar
Surrogate Parenting v. Commonwealth ex. rel. Armstrong, 704 S.W. 2d 109 (Ky. 1986).Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House Subcommittee on Transportation, Tourism, and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. Surrogacy Arrangements Act of 1987. Hearings, October 15, 1987. Wash. D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987.Google Scholar