Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:14:28.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special issue introduction

The body in politics — emotional, perceptual, and visceral dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2017

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , Fall 2017 , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
© Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Losco, J., “From outrage to orthodoxy? Sociobiology and political science at 35,” Politics and the Life Sciences , 2011, 30(1): 80–84.Google Scholar
Grabe, M. E. and Bucy, E. P., Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, D., “Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005–2015,” American Behavioral Scientist , 2016, 60(14): 1656–1675.Google Scholar
See P. A. Stewart, F. K. Salter, and M. Mehu, “Taking leaders at face value: Ethology and the analysis of televised leader displays,” Politics and the Life Sciences, 2009, 28(1): 48–74.Google Scholar
Bucy, E. P. and Grabe, M. E., “Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992–2004,” Journal of Communication , 2007, 57(4): 652–675.Google Scholar