Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:27:55.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The two cultures of ‘biopolitics’: Comment in response to Liesen and Walsh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2016

Patrick A. Stewart*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, 428 Old Main, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 pastewar@uark.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Biopolitics Forum
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

References

1. Snow, Charles P., “The two cultures,” Leonardo 1990, 23(2/3): 169173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Sokal, Alan D., “Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity,” Social Text 1996, 46/47: 217252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Livingston, Julie, Puar, Jasbir K.“Interspecies,” Social Text, 2011, 29(1106): 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dunbar, Robin I. M. D., The Trouble with Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
5. Firestein, Stuart, Ignorance: How It Drives Science (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
6. Mazur, Allan, “Believers and disbelievers in evolution,” Politics and the Life Sciences 2004, 23(2): 5561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fisher, Maryanne L., Kruger, Daniel J., and Garcia, Justin R., “Understanding and enhancing the role of the mass media in evolutionary psychology education,” Evolution: Education and Outreach 2011, 4(1): 7582.Google Scholar
8. Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar