Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:57:11.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cycles in symbol production? A new model to explain concentration, diversity and innovation in the music industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Michael Christianen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the publication of the article ‘Cycles in symbol production’ (Peterson and Berger 1975) a discussion started concerning the advantages and disadvantages of the production of cultural goods under market conditions. The analysis by Peterson and Berger showed a negative correlation between concentration in the recording industry, on the one hand, and the diversity and innovativeness of the music, on the other. Repetition of the analysis using data from the 1980s (Burnett 1990; Lopes 1992) has shown that for this period Peterson and Berger's hypotheses should be rejected. Is there a connection between concentration and diversity and innovation? Are there cycles in symbol production? There seems to be no conclusive answer. In this article, I will attempt to clear up this matter. First, I will repeat the analysis of the relation between concentration and diversity/innovation, using the same model as Peterson and Berger, but with different definitions for the variables concentration, diversity and innovation. Then I will suggest a new model, which can be helpful in uncovering other factors influencing diversity and innovation in the music industry. I will come to that later. Let me first give the reader a brief overview of previous research.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 55 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, B., Hesbacher, P., Etzkorn, K.P. & Denisoff, R.S. 1980. ‘Hit record trends, 1940–1997’, Journal of Communication, Vol 30:2, spring 1980, pp. 31–43Google Scholar
Burnett, Robert & Weber, R.P. 1988. ‘Concentration and diversity in the popular music industry, 1948–1986’. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Robert. 1990. ‘Concentration and diversity in the international phonogram industry’. PhD Dissertation Dept of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Robert. 1992. ‘The implications of ownership: changes for concentration and diversity in the phonogram industry’, Communication Research, Vol 19:6, pp. 749–69Google Scholar
Burnett, Robert. 1993. ‘The popular music industry in transition’, Popular Music & Society, Vol 17:1, pp. 87–114.Google Scholar
Christianen, Michael 1994. ‘Culture industries and cultural diversity: the Dutch music industry’. Paper 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics, Witten/Herdecke, 08 24–27, 1994Google Scholar
Crane, Diana 1992. ‘The production of culture: Media and the urban arts’. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Heikki & Soramaki, Martti 1984. ‘Video: commercial structures and cultural changes’. Paper XIV IAMCR Conference,Prague, Czechoslovakia,August 27–31, 1984Google Scholar
Hirsch, Paul M. 1985. ‘US cultural productions: the impact of ownership’. Journal of Communication 35, Summer 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Paul D. 1992. ‘Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry 1969 to 1990’, American Sociological Review, Vol 57 (02), pp. 56–71Google Scholar
Mondak, J. 1989. ‘Cultural heterogeneity in capitalist society: in defence of repetition on the Billboard Hot 100’, Popular Music & Society, Vol 13:3, pp. 45–57Google Scholar
Peterson, Richard A. and Berger, David G. 1975. ‘Cycles in symbol production: the case of popular music’, American Sociological Review, vol 40, pp. 158–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Walter W. 1982. ‘From craft to corporation: the impact of ownership on book publishing’, in: Ettema, James & Whitney, (eds) Individuals in Mass Media Organizations: Creativity and Constraints (Beverly Hills), pp. 33–52Google Scholar
Radevagen, Thomas & Zielinski, Siegfried. 1984. ‘Video-software: Structuren des Marktes und Tendenzen des Angebotes’, Media Perspectieven (5)Google Scholar
Rothenbuhler, Eric W. & Dimmick, John W. 1982. ‘Popular music: concentration and diversity in the industry, 1974–1980’, Journal of Communication, winter, pp. 143–9Google Scholar
Schulze, Ralf. 1994. ‘Hit record trends on the German music market for popular music 1975–1993: cycles of market concentration and product diversity’. Paper 8th International Congress on Cultural Economics, Witten/Herdecke, 08 24–27, 1994Google Scholar
Visser, Henk. 1994. ‘Diversiteit en innovatie in de Nederlandse populaire muziekcultuur: Een onder-zoek naar het opgaan van een samenhang tussen economische en culturele processen’. MA-thesis, Vakgroep Communicatiewetenschap, Katholieke Universiteit NijmegenGoogle Scholar