Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:07:17.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of harmony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Extract

There are two seemingly self-evident truths concerning the harmonic practices of popular music. The first, which finds clear expression in Adorno, is that such music's harmonic language is both detrimentally limited and static. The harmonic repertoire is considered to consist of a few formulae (Adorno deals with them in terms of standardisation: see Middleton 1990, p. 45ff.), by means of which song-writers string together their songs, uninfluenced by the song's content. For the expert listener, therefore, popular music should be uninteresting: it is only its psycho-economic dimension which makes it worthy of study. This tends also to be the conclusion of established musicology, except that there it is felt such ‘extra-musical’ speculation is best left to the sociologist. The second truth is that the differences between Afro-American-derived styles are material, since our identities are so strongly incorporated in the styles we use:

We mark out the differences between genres and styles partly by reference to contrasts in the way this stock of techniques and sounds is used. (Middleton 1990, p. 88)

Since harmony is not only at the forefront of traditional analytical investigation, but also forms an important initial focus for songwriters, it may well be assumed that it is therefore an important factor in enabling us to distinguish, for example, ‘rock’ from ‘pop’ from ‘soul’. However, the material reality behind these differences of style has rarely been subject to systematic investigation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1941. ‘On popular music’, Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, 9Google Scholar
Burns, Gary. 1987. ‘A typology of “hooks” in popular records’, Popular Music, 6/1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Nicholas. 1989. ‘Music theory and “good comparison”: a Viennese perspective’, Journal of Music Theory, 33/1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiler, Alan. 1981. ‘Two views of musical semiotics’ in The Sign in Music and Literature, ed. Steiner, Wendy, 1981 (Texas)Google Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan. 1988. The Time of Music (Collier-Macmillan)Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred & Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music (Massachusetts)Google Scholar
Mehegan, John. 1959. Jazz Improvisation (Watson-Guptill)Google Scholar
Middleton, Richard. 1990. Studying Popular Music (Open University Press)Google Scholar
Moore, Allan. 1990. On the Late Chamber Works of Roberto Gerhard, Ph.D. thesis, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Nettl, Bruno. 1985. The Western Impact on World Music (Schirmer)Google Scholar
Perlman, Alan & Greenblatt, Daniel. 1981. ‘Miles Davis meets Noam Chomsky: some observations on jazz improvisation and language structure’ in The Sign in Music and Literature, ed. Steiner, Wendy, 1981 (Texas)Google Scholar
Schenker, Heinrich. 1979. Der freie Satz (trans. and ed. Oster, Ernst), (Massachusetts)Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1962. ‘The architecture of complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106Google Scholar
Steedman, Mark. 1984. ‘A generative grammar for jazz chord sequences’, Music Psychology, 2/1Google Scholar