Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:02:10.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology, accessibility and creativity in popular music education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2009

BEN CHALLIS
BEN CHALLIS
Affiliation:
Department of Drama and Music, Cardiff School of Creative and Cultural Industries, University of Glamorgan, 86–88 Adam Street, Cardiff CF24 2XF, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Middle Eight
Information
Popular Music , Volume 28 , Special Issue 3: Popular Music and Disability , October 2009 , pp. 425 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbotson, M., Abbotson, R., Kirk, P.R., Hunt, A.D., and Cleaton, A. 1994. ‘Computer music in the service of music therapy: The MIDI Grid and MIDI Creator systems’, Medical Engineering Physics, 16, May,p. 253Google Scholar
Anderson, T., and Smith, C. 1996. ‘Composability: widening participation in music making for people with disabilities via music software and controller solutions’, in Proc. of ASSETS '96Google Scholar
Boehm, C. 2007. ‘The discipline that never was. Current developments in music technology in higher education Britain’, in Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1/1(Intellect Ltd)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, I., McKennell, A., and Walker, E. 1991. Blind and Partially Sighted Adults in Britain: the RNIB Survey (London, Her Majesty's Stationary Office)Google Scholar
Challis, B.P., and Challis, K. 2008. ‘Applications for proximity sensors in music and sound performance’, in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
Challis, B.P., and Edwards, A.D.N. 1997. ‘Non-visual music representation: a computer based approach’, in Interfaces, 35, Summer 1997, Bulletin of The British HCI Group.Google Scholar
Challis, B.P., and Edwards, A.D.N. 2000. ‘Weasel: a system for the non-visual presentation of music notation’, in Proc. of ICCHP 2000Google Scholar
Challis, B.P., and Smith, R. 2008. ‘Inclusive technology and community music’, in Proc. of Accessible Design in the Digital WorldGoogle Scholar
Challis, B.P., Smith, R., and Wiblin, I. 2008. Untitled. Open Ear, Cardiff, http://openear.wordpress.com/Google Scholar
Eno, B. 2004. ‘The studio as compositional tool’ (reprinted article from Downbeat July/August 1983), in Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music, ed. Cox, C. and Warner, D. (Continuum)Google Scholar
HM Gov. 2001. ‘Explanatory Notes to the Special Educational Needs And Disability Act 2001’, chapter 2 of part 2, ISBN 010 561 001 1Google Scholar
Hunt, A., and Kirk, P.R. 1988. ‘MIDIGRID – a new musical performance and composition system’, in Proc. of the Institute of AcousticsGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, D. 1994. ‘Designing an offscreen model for a GUI’, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Computers for Handicapped People (Berlin, Springer Verlag)Google Scholar
Magee, W. 2006. ‘Electronic technologies in clinical music therapy: a survey of practice and attitudes’, Technology and Disability, 18, pp. 139–146 (IOS Press)Google Scholar
Magnusson, T. 2006. ‘Affordances and constraints in screen-based musical instruments’, in Proc. of the 4th Nordic Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (Oslo, Norway, ACM)Google Scholar
Malloch, J., Birnbaum, D., Sinyor, E., and Wanderley, M. 2006. ‘Towards a new conceptual framework for digital musical instruments’, in Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio EffectsGoogle Scholar
McCann, W. 2000. ‘The Dancing Dots music editor: a non-graphical approach to scoring for the blind musician or dyslexic’, in Proc. of the CSUN Conf. on Technology and Persons with Disabilities (2000)Google Scholar
McKenzie, N., and Marwick-Johnstone, B. 2008. ‘Making the I-Maestro music learning framework accessible’, in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
Moore, A.F. 1993. Rock: The Primary Text (Open University Press)Google Scholar
Nicotra, G., and Quatraro, A. 2008. ‘CONTRAPUNCTUS Project: a new computer solution for Braille music fruition’, in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
Ockelford, A. 1996. Music Matters, Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB), ISBN 1-85878-071-3Google Scholar
Pitts, A., and Kwami, R.M. 2002. ‘Raising students' performance in music composition through the use of information and communications technology (ICT): a survey of secondary schools in England’, British Journal of Music Education, 19/1, pp. 61–71 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Savage, J., and Challis, M. 2001. ‘Dunwich revisited: collaborative composition and performance with new technologies’, British Journal of Music Education, 18/2, pp. 139–149 (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Swingler, T. 1998. ‘“That Was Me!”: applications of the Soundbeam MIDI controller as a key to creative communication, learning, independence and joy’, in Proc. of the CSUN Conf. on Technology and Persons with Disabilities (1998)Google Scholar
UCAS.http://www.ucas.ac.uk/students/ucas_tariff/tarifftables/#musicGoogle Scholar
Zahradnicky, T., Lorencz, R., and Musil, P. 2008. ‘Making ProTools accessible for the visually impaired’, in Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar