Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:19:13.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of microstructural changes in impacted polyurea coatings using small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Edward Balizer
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Bethesda, Maryland 20817
Jeffry Fedderly
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Bethesda, Maryland 20817
Gilbert Lee
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Bethesda, Maryland 20817
Susan Bartyczak
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division, Dahlgren, Virginia 22448
Willis Mock Jr.
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division, Dahlgren, Virginia 22448

Abstract

Three polyureas with decreasing soft segment molecular weights of 1000, 650, and a 250/1000 blend were molded onto circular steel plates and then impacted with a high speed (275 m/s) conical-shaped steel cylinder. The polyurea layer of the post mortem bilayers was characterized on a molecular level by small angle synchrotron X-ray scattering (SAXS) at the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory. Analysis revealed that the hard domains of the polyureas with lower molecular weight soft segments reformed and oriented over a greater area of the coating, thus increasing the polymer strain hardening and resulting in visibly less out of plane bilayer deformation. This agrees with the hypothesis that polymer strain hardening is a mechanism that retards necking failure of the metal plate.

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balizer, E., Lee, G., Fedderly, J., Mock, W., Rinaldi, R., Boyce, M., Zoski, G., and Toki, S. (2008). Proceedings of the 174th Meeting of the Rubber Division of the ACS, Lousiville, KY.Google Scholar
Balizer, E., and Mock, W. (2006). “Shock Wave Effects on Polymer Morphology,” APS March Meeting, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Das, S., Yilgor, I., Yilgor, E., Inci, B., Tezgel, O., Beyer, F. L., and Wilkes, G. L. (2007). “Structure-property relationships and melt rheology of segmented, non-chain extended polyureas: Effect of soft segment molecular weight,” Polymer POLMAG 48, 290301. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DRS Imaging (2002). Oakland, NJ.Google Scholar
Garrett, J. T., Siedleckiand, A. H., and Runt, J. (2001). “Microdomain morphology of poly(urethane urea) multiblock copolymers,” Macromolecules (Washington, DC, U. S.) 34, 70667070. 10.1021/ma0102114Google Scholar
Mock, W., Balizer, E., Fedderly, J., and Lee, G. (2005). “Penetration Protection of Steel Plates with a Polyurea Layer,” ONR Workshop on Materials and Structures for Advanced Ship Protection, Airlie, VA.Google Scholar
Mock, W. Jr., and Holt, W. H. (1976). Naval Surface Weapons Center Report No. NSW/DL TR-3473.Google Scholar
Sheth, J. P., Aneja, A., Wilkes, G. L., Yilgor, E., Atilla, G. E., Yilgor, I., and Beyer, F. (2004). “Influence of system variables on the morphological and dynamic mechanical behavior of polydimethylsiloxane based segmented polyurethane and polyurea copolymers: A comparative perspective,” Polymer POLMAG 45, 69196932. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, Z., and Hutchinson, J. W. (2007). “Neck retardation and enhanced energy absorption in metal–elastomer bilayers,” Mech. Mater. MSMSD3 39, 473487. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2006.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar