Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:49:08.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Application of X-Ray Powder Diffraction to Forensic Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

P. J. Thatcher  and
G. P. Briner
P. J. Thatcher
Affiliation:
State Forensic Science Laboratory, Macleod, Victoria, Australia
G. P. Briner
Affiliation:
State Chemistry Laboratory, 5 Macarthur Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although forensic science is regarded with a certain amount of fascination and admiration by the general public, to the practising forensic scientist it is often associated with painstaking and frustrating examinations.

This is particularly so in the most traditional area of forensic science, namely that of contact evidence where the identification and comparison of minute samples may provide an important clue for the investigator and assist in the conviction or exoneration of an accused person.

Contact evidence may include hairs and other fibres, paint samples, glass fragments, stains, soils and other deposits. Modern instrumentation such as infra-red spectrophotometry, gas chromatography, atomic absorption spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis now allows a relatively simple identification of the composition of these materials. However, these techniques are not necessarily directed towards the absolute determination of structure of materials and this is particularly so in the case of crystalline materials of forensic interest such as soil, mortar, brick dust and paint fillers. Although the techniques previously mentioned provide the basis of an elemental analysis this may not be of much assistance in a forensic approach where chemical structure is the basis of a scentific comparison.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 320 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrick, J. C., Polk, D. E., Raman, R. V. and Giessen, B. C. (1977) J.For.Sa., 22, p.515.Google Scholar
Canfield, D. V. and De Forest, P. R. (1977)J.Far.Sci., 22, p. 337.Google Scholar
Curry, C. J., Rendle, D. F. and Rogers, A. (1982) J.For.Sci.Soc., 22, p. 173.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. and Goebel, R. (1984) J.For.Sci., 29, p. 15.Google Scholar
Folen, V. A. (1975) J.For.Sci., 20, p.348.Google Scholar
Foner, H. A. and Adam, N. (1983) J.For.Sci.Soc., 23, p.313.Google Scholar
Higgs, D. G., Jones, P. N., Markham, J. A. and Newton, E. (1978) J.For.Sci.Soc., 18, p.137.Google Scholar
Lynch, B. J. and Kerrigan, G. C. (1981) X-Ray Spectometry, 10, p. 196.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. H. and Chang, W. J. (1984) J.App.Cryst., 17, p.212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassa, M., Leist, Y., and Steinberg, M. (1982) J.For.Sci., 27, p.677.Google Scholar
Thrall, M. A., Dial, G. M. and Winder, D. R. (1985) Vet. Pathol., 22, p.625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar