Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:05:42.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Establishing an Instrumental Peak Profile Calibration Standard for Powder Diffraction Analyses: International Round Robin Conducted by the JCPDS-ICDD and the U.S. National Bureau of Standards†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

T. G. Fawcett ,
C. E. Crowder ,
S. J. Brownell ,
Y. Zhang ,
C. Hubbard ,
W. Schreiner ,
G. P. Hamill ,
T. C. Huang ,
E. Sabino  and
J. I. Langford
...Show all authors
T. G. Fawcett
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, France
C. E. Crowder
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, France
S. J. Brownell
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, France
Y. Zhang
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, France
C. Hubbard
Affiliation:
The National Bureau of Standards, France
W. Schreiner
Affiliation:
Philips Laboratories, France
G. P. Hamill
Affiliation:
GTE Laboratories Inc., France
T. C. Huang
Affiliation:
IBM Research, France
E. Sabino
Affiliation:
The PQ Corporation, France
J. I. Langford
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, France
R. Hamilton
Affiliation:
U.K., Air Products Corporation, France
D. Louër
Affiliation:
University of Rennes, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the explosive growth in the number of highly automated powder diffraction systems, many types of analyses which were previously considered a specialty analysis are now performed on a routine basis. Algorithms have been developed for measuring peak profiles from which crystallite sizes, residual microstrain, and X-ray crystal structure (Rietveld techniques for example) can be determined. However, these techniques require an instrumental peak profile calibration standard to correct the experimental data for instrumental broadening due to the system optics.

Significant problems are encountered when laboratories try to cross-correlate or reproduce published data due to the lack of a common reference material for instrumental calibration. This is particularly distressing in microstrain and crystallite size calculations which can be dramatically affected by a poor choice of standard materials. Microstrain and crystallite size measurement are becoming increasingly important for the characterization of advanced materials and catalysts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 209 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A. and Edmonds, J. W., (1980). Adv. in X-Ray Analysis, 23, 361.Google Scholar
Brown, A., private communication.Google Scholar
Cox, D. E., Toby, B. H. and Eddy, M. M., Proceedings of the International Symposium on X-Ray Powder Diffractometry, Freemantle (1987) to be published in Aust. J. Phys.Google Scholar
Goebel, H., private communication.Google Scholar
Kincaid, P. J., Newman, R. A. and Fawcett, T. G., (1987). Adv. In X-Ray Analysis, 30, 407.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., (1974). “X-Ray Diffraction Procedures”, John Wiley and Sons, N.Y., N.Y., 2nd Edition.Google Scholar
Langford, J. L., Louër, D., Sonneveld, E. J. and Visser, J. W., Powder Diffraction, (1986). Vol. 1, No. 3, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, R. A., Kirchhoff, P. Moore and Fawcett, T. G., (1984). Adv. In X-Ray Analysis, 27, 261.Google Scholar
Rau, R. C., Norelco Reporter, (1963). Vol. X, No. 3, 114.Google Scholar