Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:50:03.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental determination of the instrumental broadening in the Bragg–Brentano geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

P. Scardi ,
L. Lutterotti  and
P. Maistrelli
P. Scardi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei Materiali, Università di Trento, 38050 Mesiano (TN), Italy
L. Lutterotti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dei Materiali, Università di Trento, 38050 Mesiano (TN), Italy
P. Maistrelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, 38050 Povo (TN), Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple procedure was devised for the preparation of a standard KCl powder to be used for the experimental determination of the instrumental profile in the Bragg–Brentano geometry. The standard was tested on several diffractometers, and narrow Bragg reflections in the range 28°–132° were recorded adopting various experimental conditions. Profiles were modeled with analytical functions, to describe the trend of width and shape of the instrumental profile as a function of the diffraction angle. Some indications were given to perform reliable profile fitting and line broadening analysis; a high resolution setup, obtained by employing narrow slits, large goniometer radius, and a monochromator in the diffracted beam, gives narrow reflections, even though the intensity of the diffracted beam is considerably reduced. The choice of these experimental conditions, which can be achieved using the majority of the commercial instruments, leads to symmetrical profiles, even at relatively low angle (2Θ=28°), which are highly recommended for reliable profile fitting and line broadening analysis.

Keywords

X-ray powder diffractionprofile standardprofile fittingline broadening analysisBragg–Brentano geometry
Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 180 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzar, D. (1992). “Profile Fitting of X-ray Diffraction Lines and Fourier Analysis of Broadening,” J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caglioti, G., Paoletti, A., and Ricci, F. P. (1958). Nucl. Instrum. Methods 3, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. (1992). “A Fundamental Parameters Approach to X-ray Line Profile Fitting,” J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B.D. (1978). Elements of X-ray Diffraction (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA), 2nd ed., p. 102.Google Scholar
Enzo, S., Fagherazzi, G., Benedetti, A., and Polizzi, S. (1988). “A Profile-Fitting Procedure for Analysis of Broadened X-ray Diffraction Peaks. I. Methodology,” J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, T. G., Crowder, C. E., Brownell, S. J., Zhang, Y., Hubbard, C., Schreiner, W., Hamill, G. P., Huang, T. C., Sabino, E., Langford, J. I., Hamilton, R., and Louër, D. (1988). “Establishing an Instrumental Peak Profile Calibration Standard for Powder Diffraction Analysis: International Round Robin Conducted by the JCPDS-ICDD and the U.S. National Bureau of Standards,” Powder Diffr. 3, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, H. P., and Alexander, L. E. (1974a). X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials (Wiley, New York), 2nd ed., pp. 642–708.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P., and Alexander, L. E. (1974b). X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials (Wiley, New York), 2nd ed., pp. 366–367.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P., and Alexander, L. E. (1974c). X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials (Wiley, New York), 2nd ed., pp. 290–297.Google Scholar
Kogan, V. A., and Kupriyanov, M. F. (1992). “X-ray Powder Diffraction Line Profiles by Fourier Synthesis,” J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, J. I., Boultif, A., Auffrédic, J. P., and Louër, D. (1993). “The Use of Pattern Decomposition to Study the Combined X-ray Diffraction Effects to Crystallite Size and Stacking Faults in Ex-Oxalate Zinc Oxide,” J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bail, A. (1985). “Analyse Globale de Spectres de Diffraction des Materiaux Mai Cristallises,” Proc. 10th Colloque Rayons X, p. 45 (Siemens, Grenoble).Google Scholar
Lutterotti, L., Maistrelli, P., Scardi, P., Artioli, G., Masciocchi, N., Bellotto, M., Berti, G., Cappuccio, G., Chiari, G., Massarotti, V., Zanazzi, P. (1993). “XRPD of KCl on Different Diffractometers: Lattice Parameters and Structure Refinement,” Proc. 23th Congress of AIC (AIC, Venice, 19-22/10/1993), 104–105.Google Scholar
Lutterotti, L., and Scardi, P. (1990). “Simultaneous Structure and Size-Strain Refinement by the Rietveld Method,” J. Appl. Cryst. 23, 246–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutterotti, L., Scardi, P., and Maistrelli, M. (1992). “LS1-A Computer Program for Simultaneous Refinement of Material Structure and Microstructure,” J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardi, P., Lutterotti, L., and Di Maggio, R. (1991). “XRD Microstructural Characterization of Tetragonal Pure Zirconia Powders Obtained by Controlled Hydrolysis of Zirconium Alkoxides,” Powder Diff. 6, 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. K., and Gorter, S. (1991). “Powder Diffraction Program Information 1990 Program List,” J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, A. R. (1948). “A Numerical Fourier-Analysis Method for the Correction of Widths and Shapes of Lines on X-Ray Diffraction Photographs,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) Ser. A 61, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmers, J., Delhez, R., Tuinstra, F., and Peerdeman, F. (1992). “X-Ray Tracing, a Tool for Improved Accuracy in Powder Diffractometry,” in Accuracy in Powder Diffraction II, NIST Special Publication No. 846, edited by Prince, E. and Stalick, J. K. (NIST, Washington, DC), p. 217.Google Scholar
Warren, B. E. (1969). X-ray Diffraction (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA), pp. 251–314.Google Scholar
Warren, B. E., and Averbach, B. L. (1950). “The Effect of Cold-Work Distortion on X-Ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 21, 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, B. E., and Averbach, B. L. (1952). “The Separation of Cold-Work Distortion and Particle Size Broadening in X-ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 23, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheim, G. K., Butler, M. A., West, K. W., and Buchanan, D. N. E. (1974). “Determination of the Gaussian and Lorentzian Content of Experimental Line Shapes,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 45, 1369–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar