Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:44:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IndexCub: a ready-to-use set of routines for X-ray diffraction line profile analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2019

F. F. Contreras-Torres Open the ORCID record for F. F. Contreras-Torres [Opens in a new window]
F. F. Contreras-Torres*
Affiliation:
Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: contreras.flavio@tec.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The growing interest in the use of powder X-ray diffractometry for materials’ characterization has led to the introduction of relevant concepts (e.g. microstructure, strain, anisotropy, texture) to undergraduate teaching in engineering and science. In this concern, the study of polycrystalline materials underlays the use of appropriate software: free, licensed, proprietary, or commercial to assist research on structure determination, structure refinement, and microstructure characterization. Today with the easy access to personal computers, routines for powder diffractometry also becomes feasible to use for non-specialist. Therefore, it would be relevant that students with computing knowledge may decide to improve routines on such three tasks incorporating their own computational approaches. In this study, we show the development of a ready-to-use and open source program written in GNU-Octave (v4.2.1) focused on X-ray diffraction line-profile analysis. The programing language platform was chosen mainly because of two reasons: (1) there is no requirement for commercial licenses, meaning that both programing language and routines can be downloaded online, facilitating collaborative efforts between students, instructors, and developers, and (2) easy re-coding of evaluation strategies is always allowed through fast implementation of modules into the code. The code, IndexCub, features routines for background subtraction, whole profile smoothing, and Kα2 radiation removal, location of diffraction peaks positions, indexing for cubic specimens, multi peak separation of individual peaks, and evaluation of full-width at half-maximum and integral breadth values. Microstructure properties are characterized through the use of integral breadth methods (e.g. Williamson–Hall) and Fourier analysis (e.g. Warren–Averbach), and the anisotropy effects are incorporated introducing calculations of contrast factors. In terms of diffraction domain sizes, size distribution, and the lattice microstrain, the analysis of the microstructure is discussed along with examples for polycrystalline coarse-grained materials (NaCl), epitaxial film (Si), and thin-films (Au) specimens. The code facilitates the understanding of microstructure analysis by using theoretical approaches well established and in state-steady level.

Keywords

X-ray diffractionmicrostructurepolycrystalline powdersthin-films
Type
Technical Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 110 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, N. and Lynch, P. (2004). “Determining the dislocation contrast factor for X-ray line profile analysis,” in Diffraction Analysis of the Microstructure of Materials, edited by Mittemeijer, E. J. and Scardi, P. (Springer, Heidelberg), pp. 249–286.Google Scholar
Borbély, A., Dragomir-Cernatescu, J., Ribárik, G., and Ungár, T. (2003). “Computer program ANIZC for the calculation of diffraction contrast factors of dislocations in elastically anisotropic cubic, hexagonal and trigonal crystals,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 160–162.Google Scholar
Butera, R. A. and Waldeck, D. H. (1997). “X-ray diffraction investigation of alloys,” J. Chem. Educ. 74, 115–119.Google Scholar
Cavazos-Cavazos, D. and Contreras-Torres, F. F. (2017). “Determination of contrast factors for cubic slip-systems and their application in the microstructural characterization of binary Fm3m materials,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 110, 36–42.Google Scholar
Cranswick, L. (2008). “Computer software for powder diffraction,” in Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice, edited by Dinnebier, R. E. and Billinge, S. J. L. (RSC Publishing, Cambridge), pp. 494–570.Google Scholar
de Rooi, J. J., van der Pers, N. M., Hendrikx, R. W. A., Delhez, R. A., Böttgerb, J., and Eilersa, P. H. C. (2014). “Smoothing of X-ray diffraction data and Ka2 elimination using penalized likelihood and the composite link model,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 47, 852–860.Google Scholar
Eilers, P. H. C. (2007). “Ill-posed problems with counts, the composite link model and penalized likelihood,” Stat. Model. 7, 239–254.Google Scholar
Gleiter, H. (2000). “Nanostructured materials: basic concepts and microstructure,” Acta Mater. 48, 1–29.Google Scholar
Gubicza, J. (2014). X-Ray Profile Analysis in Materials Science (IGI Global, Hershey).Google Scholar
Hoff, W. D. and Kitchingman, W. J. (1966). “Computer indexing of X-ray powder patterns from crystals of unknown structures,” J. Sci. Instrum. 43, 952–953.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (2001). “Landmarks in the development of powder diffraction instrumentation,” J. Chem. Educ. 78, 601–606.Google Scholar
Klimanek, P. and Kuzel, R. (1988). “X-ray diffraction line broadening due to dislocations in non-cubic materials. I. General considerations and the case of elastic isotropy applied to hexagonal crystals,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 21, 59–66.Google Scholar
Kril, C. E. and Birringer, R. (1998). “Estimating grain-size distributions in nanocrystalline materials from X-ray diffraction profile analysis,” Philos. Mag. A 77, 621–640.Google Scholar
Krivoglaz, M. A., Martynenko, O. V., and Ryaboshapka, K. P. (1983). “Effect of dislocation distribution correlation on X-ray diffraction by deformed crystals,” Phys. Metals Metallogr. 55, 5–17.Google Scholar
Langford, J. I., Louër, D., and Scardi, P. (2000). “Effect of a crystallite size distribution on X-ray diffraction line profiles and whole-powder-pattern fitting,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 33, 964–974.Google Scholar
Leoni, M., Confente, T., and Scardi, P. (2006). “PM2K: a flexible program implementing whole powder pattern modelling,” Z. Kristallogr. Suppl. 23, 249–254.Google Scholar
Luo, J., Ying, K., and Bai, J. (2005). “Savitzky–Golay smoothing and differentiation filter for even number data,” Signal Process. 85, 1429–1434.Google Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, J., Leoni, M., and Scardi, P. (2009). “A general approach for determining the diffraction contrast factor of straight-line dislocations,” Acta Crystallogr. A65, 109–119.Google Scholar
Matej, Z., Nichtová, L., and Kuzel, R. (2008). “Expanding FOX for microstructure analysis,” Mater. Struct. 15, 46–49.Google Scholar
Mitra, G. B. and Misra, N. K. (1966). “Background errors in X-ray diffraction parameters,” Brit. J. App. Phys. 17, 1319–1328.Google Scholar
Pope, C. G. (1997). “X-Ray diffraction and the Bragg equation,” J. Chem. Educ. 74, 129–131.Google Scholar
Rachinger, W. A. (1948). “A correction of the a1 a2 doublet in the measurements of widths of X-ray diffraction lines,” J. Sci. Instrum. 25, 254–255.Google Scholar
Ribárik, G., Ungár, T., and Gubicza, J. (2001). “MWP-fit: a program for multiple whole profile fitting of diffraction profiles by ab-initio theoretical functions,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 34, 669–676.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Delgado, M., Ornelas-Soto, N., Martínez-Lorán, E., Hernandez-Luna, C., García-García, A., and Contreras-Torres, F. F. (2017). “Enhanced Enzymatic activity of laccase (from pycnoporus sanguineus CS43) immobilized on sputtered nanostructured gold thin films,” J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 17, 939–946.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. (2001). “The development of instrumentation for thin-film X-ray diffraction,” J. Chem. Educ. 78, 613–616.Google Scholar
Savitzky, A. and Golay, M. J. E. (1964). “Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures,” Anal. Chem. 36, 1627–1639.Google Scholar
Scardi, P. and Leoni, M. (1999). “Fourier modelling of the anisotropic line broadening of X-ray diffraction profiles due to line and plane lattice defects,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 32, 671–682.Google Scholar
Scardi, P. and Leoni, M. (2001). “Diffraction line profiles from polydisperse crystalline systems,” Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A: Found. Crystallogr. 57, 604–613.Google Scholar
Scardi, P. and Leoni, M. (2002). “Whole powder pattern modelling,” Acta Crystallogr. A 58, 190–200.Google Scholar
Schramm, R. E. (1971). “Corrections and calculations on a X-ray diffraction line profile: a computer program,” Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Tech. Note 600, 6, 1–34.Google Scholar
Simm, T. H., Withers, P. J., and Quinta da Fonseca, J. (2016). “An evaluation of diffraction peak profile analysis (DPPA) methods to study plastically deformed metals,” Mater. Des. 111, 331–343.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. L., Fiala, J., and Bunge, H. J. (1999). Defect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
Stojilovic, N. (2018). “Using Cu Kα1/Kα2 splitting and a powder XRD system to discuss X-ray generation,” J. Chem. Educ. 95, 598–600.Google Scholar
Suryanarayana, C. (1995). “Nanocrystalline materials,” Intern. Mater. Rev. 40, 41–64.Google Scholar
Ungar, T. (1969). “Computer program for x-ray diffraction line profile analysis,” J. Sci. Instrum. 2, 114–116.Google Scholar
Ungár, T. and Borbély, A. (1996). “The effect of dislocation contrast on x-ray line broadening: a new approach to line profile analysis,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3173–3175.Google Scholar
Werner, P.-E., Eriksson, L., and Westdahl, M. (1985). “TREOR, a semi-exhaustive trial-and-error powder indexing program for all symmetries,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 18, 367–370.Google Scholar
Wilkens, M. (1970). “The determination of density and distribution of dislocations in deformed single crystals from broadened X-ray diffraction profiles,” Phys. Status Solidi A 2, 359–370.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Contreras-Torres supplementary material

Contreras-Torres supplementary material 1

Download Contreras-Torres supplementary material(File)
File 729.9 KB