Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:36:37.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray powder data for synthetic dolerophanite, copper(II) oxysulphate [Cu2O(SO4)]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

A. R. Ginting ,
B. H. O'Connor  and
J. G. Dunn
A. R. Ginting
Affiliation:
School of Applied Chemistry, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, Australia 6102
B. H. O'Connor*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied PhysicsCurtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, Australia 6102
J. G. Dunn
Affiliation:
School of Applied Chemistry, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, Australia 6102
*
a)To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bragg–Brentano X-ray powder diffractometry data and refined unit cell parameters are reported for a synthetic sample of dolerophanite, copper (II) oxysulphate [Cu2O(SO4)], prepared by heating AR copper (II) sulphate anhydrate in a muffle furnace at 725 °C. The data are compared with (i) two Debye–Scherrer patterns published by Mrose [Am. Mineral. 6, 146–153 (1961)]—for a synthetic sample and for a natural dolerophanite, the latter being pattern 13–189 in the ICDD Powder Diffraction File and (ii) a Debye–Scherrer pattern for a synthetic dolerophanite described by Borchardt and Daniels [J. Phys. Chem. 61, 917–921 (1957)]. A calculated pattern is also presented for the crystal structure of dolerophanite described by Effenberger [Monatschefte fur Chemie. 116, 927–931 (1985)]. The measured and calculated patterns reported here show reasonable internal consistency for both line positions and intensity data. While the agreement between these results and the data sets of Mrose is sound in terms of line positions, there is substantial disagreement overall between the intensity values given by the authors and those of Mrose. There is closer agreement between the intensities from the current study and those of Borchardt and Daniels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 21 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aneesuddin, M., Char, P. N., Hussain, M. R., and Saxena, E. R. (1983). J. Thermal. Anal. 26, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchardt, H. J., and Daniels, F. (1957). J. Phys. Chem. 61, 917–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B. L., Smith, D. K., and Holomany, M. A. (1989). Powder Diffr. 4, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, J. G., Ginting, A. R., and O'Connor, B. H. (1993). J. Thermal Anal. In print.Google Scholar
Effenberger, H. (1985). Monatschefte fur Chemie. 116, 927–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, T. R. (1965). Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME. 233, 359–361.Google Scholar
Mrose, M. E. (1961). Am. Mineral. 6, 146–153.Google Scholar
Smith, G. S., and Snyder, R. L. (1979). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 12, 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, P.-E. (1969). Ark. Kemi. 31, 513–516.Google Scholar
Wolff, de P. M. (1968). J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar