Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:49:29.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaster Risk Education of Final Year High School Students Requires a Partnership with Families and Charity Organizations: An International Cross-sectional Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2016

Tudor A. Codreanu ,
Antonio Celenza  and
Hanh Ngo
Tudor A. Codreanu*
Affiliation:
West Australian Country Health Services, Bunbury and Busselton Hospitals, Critical Care Directorate, Emergency Department, Busselton, Western Australia, Australia
Antonio Celenza
Affiliation:
Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Hanh Ngo
Affiliation:
Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
*
Correspondence: Tudor A. Codreanu, MD West Australian Country Health Services Busselton Hospital, Emergency Department Locked Bag 3 Busselton 6280, Western Australia E-mail: tudor.codreanu@health.wa.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of disaster reduction education (DRE) is to achieve behavioral change. Over the past two decades, many efforts have been directed towards this goal, but educational activities have been developed based on unverified assumptions. Further, the literature has not identified any significant change towards disaster preparedness at the individual level. In addition, previous research suggests that change is dependent on multiple independent predictors. It is difficult to determine what specific actions DRE might result in; therefore, the preamble of such an action, which is to have discussions about it, has been chosen as the surrogate outcome measure for DRE success. This study describes the relationship of the perceived entity responsible for disaster education, disaster education per se, sex, and country-specific characteristics, with students discussing disasters with friends and family as a measure of proactive behavioral change in disaster preparedness.

Methods

A total of 3,829 final year high school students participated in an international, multi-center prospective, cross-sectional study using a validated questionnaire. Nine countries with different levels of disaster exposure risk and economic development were surveyed. Regression analyses examined the relationship between the likelihood of discussing disasters with friends and family (dependent variable) and a series of independent variables.

Results

There was no statistically significant relationship between a single entity responsible for disaster education and discussions about potential hazards and risks with friends and/or family. While several independent predictors showed a significant main effect, DRE through school lessons in interaction with Family & Charity Organizations had the highest predictive value.

Conclusions

Disaster reduction education might require different delivery channels and methods and should engage with the entities with which the teenagers are more likely to collaborate.

CodreanuTA, CelenzaA, NgoH. Disaster Risk Education of Final Year High School Students Requires a Partnership with Families and Charity Organizations: An International Cross-sectional Survey. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):242–254.

Keywords

charity organizationdisaster risk reductioneducationfamilyhigh school
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 31 , Supplement 3 , June 2016 , pp. 242 - 254
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. UNISDR; 2009. http://www.unisdr.org/ files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2013.Google Scholar
2. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: building the resilience for nations and communities to disasters. UNISDR; 2005. http://www.unisdr.org/files/1037_hyogoframeworkforactionenglish.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Bennett, P, Murphy, S. Psychology and Health Promotion. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
4. Paton, D, Johnston, D. Disasters and communities: vulnerability, resilience, and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management. 2001;10(4):270-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Mileti, DS, Fitzpatrick, C, Farhar, BC. Fostering public preparedness for natural hazards: lessons from the Parkfield Earthquake prediction. Environment & Behavior. 1992;34(3):16-20 and 36-39.Google Scholar
6. Mileti, DS, Fitzpatrick, C. The causal sequence of risk communication in the Parkfield Earthquake prediction experience. Risk Anal. 1992;12(3):393-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mileti, DS, Fitzpatrick, C. Communication of public risk: its theory and its application. Sociological Practice Review. 1991;2:20-28.Google Scholar
8. Ronan, KR, Johnston, DM. Hazards education for youth: a quasi-experimental investigation. Risk Anal. 2003;23(5):1009-1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Martin, ML. Child participation in disaster risk reduction: the case of flood-affected children in Bangladesh. Third World Quarterly. 2010;31(8):1357-1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Ronan, KR, Crellin, K, Johnston, DM, Finnis, K, Paton, D, Becker, J. Promoting child and family resilience to disasters: effects, interventions, and prevention effectiveness. Children, Youth and, Environments. 2008;18(1):323-353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sharpe, J, Kelman, I. Improving the disaster-related component of secondary school geography education in England. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education. 2011;20(4):327-343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Codreanu, TA, Celenza, A, Jacobs, I. Does disaster education of teenagers translate into better survival knowledge, knowledge of skills, and adaptive behavioral change? A systematic literature review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(6):1-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Codreanu, TA, Celenza, A, Alabdulkarim AAR. Factors associated with discussion of disasters by final year high school students: an international cross-sectional survey. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(4):1-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Uscher-Pines, L, Chandra, A, Acosta, J, Kellermann, A. Citizen preparedness for disasters: are current assumptions valid? Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6(2):170-173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Benight, C. Collective efficacy following a series of natural disasters. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2004;17(4):401-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Bajayo, R. Building community resilience to climate change through public health planning. Health Promot J Austr. 2012;23(1):30-36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Perkins, D, Long, A. “Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: a multilevel analysis.” In: Fisher AT, Sonn CC, Bishop BJ, (eds). Psychological Sense of Community: Research, Application, and Implications. New York USA: Plennum Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Codreanu supplementary material

Appendix

Download Codreanu supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB