Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:10:12.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ambulance Collisions in an Urban Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Charles E. Saunders  and
Constance J. Heye
Charles E. Saunders*
Affiliation:
Paramedic Division, Department of Public Health, City and County of San Francisco,University of California School of Medicine, and Department of Emergency Services, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, Calif.
Constance J. Heye
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Calif.
*
Paramedic Division, San Francisco Department of Public Health, 2789 25th Street, San Francisco, CA 94110USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Decisions to send an ambulance with or without lights and siren are made every day. While travel with lights and siren is presumed to have relatively more risk associated with it than travel without, little epidemiologic analysis has been conducted to compare the two modes of travel or to characterize collisions in general.

Objective:

To characterize ambulance collisions and assess the risk of traveling with lights and siren in an urban 9-1-1 environment.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive ambulance collisions of the Paramedic Division of the San Francisco Department of Public Health during a 27-month period.

Results:

The overall collision rate for lights and siren (LS) travel was higher than that for non-lights and siren travel, although the difference was not statistically significant (45.9 collisions per 100,000 LS patient travels, 95% confidence limits 29.7, 62.1, versus 27.0/100,000 for non-LS travel, 95% confidence limits 18.3, 35.7). However, the rates of resulting injuries displayed a statistically significant difference (22.2 injuries per 100,00 LS patient travel, 95% confidence limits 11.0, 33.5, versus 1.5/100,000 for non-LS travel, 95% confidence limits −0.6, 3.5). While the majority of collisions (60.0%) occurred during patient-related travel, 35.6% occurred while the ambulance was available awaiting assignment, and 4.4% in a hospital parking lot. The majority of collisions were due to inattention, failure of on-coming traffic to yield, or unsafe parking; unsafe speed was an infrequent cause. Most crashes occurred during daylight, in dry weather, and involved another vehicle.

Conclusion:

There is some elevated risk for collision and added injury during lights and siren travel compared to travel without LS. The causes for these collisions suggest that interventions designed to improve driver skills and increase citizen awareness of an approaching ambulance could help reduce the number of collisions.

Keywords

ambulancecollisioncrashemergency medical servicesEMS systemlights and sirensafetyurban
Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 118 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Auerbach, PS, Morris, JA, Phillips, JB, et al. : An analysis of ambulance accidents in Tennessee. JAMA 1987;258:1487–1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Confidence Interval Analysis [computer program]. Tavistock Square, London: BMA House, 1989.Google Scholar
3. De Lorenzo, R: Lights and sirens: A review of emergency vehicle warning systems. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:1331–1335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Elling, R: Dispelling myths on ambulance accidents. JEMS 1989;7:60–64.Google Scholar
5. Elling, R, Guerin, R: Getting there. Emergency 1990; 10: 52–56, 92.Google Scholar
6. Miller, T Vining, et al. : The Cost of Highway Crashes. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 1991.Google Scholar
7. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, General Estimates System (GES), 1990 File. California Highway Traffic Patrol: 1990 Annual Report of Fatal and Injury Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents. Sacramento: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 1991.Google Scholar
8. Saunders, C (ed): Quality Management Report, May 1992. San Francisco: Department of Public Health, Paramedic Division, 1992.Google Scholar
9. Saunders, C, Braun, O, Amick, P, et al. : Accuracy of paramedic dispatchers in prospectively determining call priority and level of service (ALS vs BLS) in San Francisco. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:450. Abstract.Google Scholar
10. Low, RB, Dunne, MJ, Blumen, IJ, et al. : Factors associated with the safety of EMS helicopters. Am J Emerg Med 1991;9:103–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed