Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:26:17.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cancellation of Scheduled Procedures as a Mechanism to Generate Hospital Bed Surge Capacity—A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2011

Olan A. Soremekun ,
Richard D. Zane ,
Andrew Walls ,
Matthew B. Allen ,
Kimberly J. Seefeld  and
Daniel J. Pallin
Olan A. Soremekun
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Richard D. Zane*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Andrew Walls
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Matthew B. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Kimberly J. Seefeld
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
Daniel J. Pallin
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts USA
*
Correspondence: Richard D. Zane, MD Department of Emergency MedicineBrigham and Women's Hospital75 Francis StreetBoston, Massachusetts 02115 USA E-mail: rzane@partners.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The ability to generate hospital beds in response to a mass-casualty incident is an essential component of public health preparedness. Although many acute care hospitals' emergency response plans include some provision for delaying or canceling elective procedures in the event of an inpatient surge, no standardized method for implementing and quantifying the impact of this strategy exists in the literature. The aim of this study was to develop a methodology to prospectively emergency plan for implementing a strategy of delaying procedures and quantifying the potential impact of this strategy on creating hospital bed capacity.

Methods: This is a pilot study. A categorization methodology was devised and applied retrospectively to all scheduled procedures during four one-week periods chosen by convenience. The categorization scheme grouped procedures into four categories: (A) procedures with no impact on inpatient capacity; (B) procedures that could be delayed indefinitely; (C) procedures that could be delayed by one week; and (D) procedures that could not be delayed. The categorization scheme was applied by two research assistants and an emergency medicine resident. All three raters categorized the first 100 cases to allow for calculation of inter-rater reliability. Maximal hospital bed capacity was defined as the 95th percentile weekday occupancy, as this is more representative of functional bed capacity than is the number of licensed beds. The main outcome was the number of hospital beds that could be created by postponing procedures in categories B and C.

Results: Maximal hospital bed capacity was 816 beds. Mean occupancy during weekdays was 759 versus 694 on weekends. By postponing Group B and C procedures, a mean of 60 beds (51 general medical/surgical and nine intensive care unit (ICU)) could be created on weekdays, and four beds (three general medical/surgical and one ICU) on weekends. This represents 7.3% and 0.49% of maximal hospital bed capacity and ICU capacity, respectively. In the event that sustained surge is needed, delaying all category B and C procedures for one week would lead to the generation of 1,235 hospital-bed days. Inter-rater reliability was high (kappa = 0.74) indicating good agreement between all three raters.

Conclusions: For the institution studied, the strategy of delaying scheduled procedures could generate inpatient capacity with maximal impact during weekdays and little impact on weekends. Future research is needed to validate the categorization scheme and increase the ability to predict inpatient surge capacity across various hospital types and sizes.

Keywords

disasterelective proceduresinpatienthealth emergencyhealth serviceshospital servicesmass casualtysurge capacity
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 224 - 229
Copyright
Copyright Soremekun © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Bioterrorism and Health System Preparedness Issue Brief No. 4. Optimizing Surge Capacity: Regional Efforts in Bioterrorism Readiness. Accessed January 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Mahoney, EJ, Harrington, DT, Biffl, WL, et al: Lessons learned from a nightclub fire: Institutional disaster preparedness. J Trauma 2005;58:487–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, MJ, Kirsch, TD, Rothman, RE, et al: Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments: A survey of medical directors and department chairs. Am J Disaster Med 2009;4:199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaig, LF, Nawar, EW: National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data 2006;372:1–29.Google Scholar
DeLia, D, Wood, E: The dwindling supply of empty beds: Implications for hospital surge capacity. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1688–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine: Hospital-based emergency care: At the breaking point. Accessed November 6, 2009.Google Scholar
Zane, RD, Biddinger, P, Ide, L, et al: Use of “shuttered” hospitals to expand surge capacity. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23:121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, C, Ibrahim, J, Augenbraun, M, et al: Integrated plan to augment surge capacity. Prehosp Disaster Med 2008;23:113–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, DP, Poste, JC, Hicks, T, et al: Hospital bed surge capacity in the event of a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med 2005;20:169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merrill, C. (Thomson Healthcare) and Elixhauser, A. (AHRQ). Hospital Stays Involving Musculoskeletal Procedures, 1997–2005. HCUP Statistical Brief #34. July 2007. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb34.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kanter, RK, Moran, JR: Hospital emergency surge capacity: An empiric New York statewide study. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:314–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schull, MJ, Stukel, TA, Vermeulen, MJ, et al: Surge capacity associated with restrictions on nonurgent hospital utilization and expected admissions during an influenza pandemic: Lessons from the Toronto severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1228–1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stratton, SJ, Tyler, RD: Characteristics of medical surge capacity demand for sudden-impact disasters. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1193–1197.Google ScholarPubMed
Schultz, CH, Koenig, KL: State of research in high-consequence hospital surge capacity. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1153–1156.Google ScholarPubMed