Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:58:52.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in Mortality Rates Among Trauma Patients Transported by Helicopter and Ambulance in Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Walter A. Kerr ,
Timothy J. Kerns  and
Richard A. Bissell
Walter A. Kerr*
Affiliation:
Maryland State Police Aviation Division, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Timothy J. Kerns
Affiliation:
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Charles McC. Mathias Jr., National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Richard A. Bissell
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Health Services, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA University of Maryland School of Medicine, Charles McC. Mathias Jr., National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
*
Aviation Division 3023, Strawberry Point Road, Baltimore, MD 21220 USA E-mail: wkerr1@gl.umbc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

A comprehensive state wide emergency medical services and helicopter transport system has been developed in the State of Maryland on the principle that early definitive care improves patient out comes. The purpose of this study was to determine if empirical data exist to support the theory that air medical transportation services provided by the Maryland State Police (Maryland State Police) Aviation Division contribute to an improved trauma patient survival rate in Maryland.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted on the records of all patients transported by helicopter or ground ambulance and admitted to the R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center of the University of Maryland Medical System) of the University of Maryland Medical System. Data were obtained from the Maryland Institute of Emergency Medical Services Systems (Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems) Shock Trauma Clinical Registry for the period January 1988 through July 1995, covering 23,002 patients. Patients included those transported directly from the scene of injury to the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems as well as those from interfacility transfers. All patients were stratified by injury severity and compared by outcome (mortality) using Mantel-Haenszel statistics.

Results:

During the study period, 11,379 patients were transported by ground and 11,623 were transported by Maryland State Police helicopter. The mean Injury Severity Score (Maryland State Police) for patients transported by ground was 12.7 (standard deviation = 12.52) and the mean Injury Severity Score for patients transported by air was 14.6 (Injury Severity Score = 13.42), p <0.001. Among patients classified as having a high index of injury severity, the mortality rate was lower among those transported by Maryland State Police helicopter than among those transported by ambulance. The mortality rate was significantly lower for air transported patient with an Injury Severity Score higher than 31.

Conclusion:

The State of Maryland has demonstrated a commitment to its citizenry and invested heavily in its public safety air medical service. This study suggests the rapid air transport of victims of traumatic events by specialized personnel in Maryland has a positive effect on the outcome of severely injured patients. Further research is necessary to clarify the causal relationships in order to more fully elucidate the value of this resource.

Keywords

air medical servicesemergencyflight paramedichealth service evaluationhelicoptermedical evacuationmedical servicesmortalityout comestrauma
Type
Special Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 52 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Neel, S: Army aeromedical evacuation procedures in Vietnam: Implications for rural America. JAMA 1968;204:99–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Finch, HF, Nareff, MJ, Watkins, PB: Wings for wounded warriors. JAMA 1967;200:391–398.Google Scholar
3. Cowley, RA, Hudson, F, Scanlon, E et al. : An economical and proved helicopter program for transporting the emergency critically ill and injured patient in Maryland. J Trauma 1973;13:1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ramzy, Al: The Maryland Emergency Medical Services System: An update. MD Med J 1988;7:517–520.Google Scholar
5. Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems: 1996–1997 Annual Report. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Services Systems 1998; p 4.Google Scholar
6. Calabrese, D: Med-Evac: The “Golden Hour” deliverer. Emergency 1980;2:58–60.Google Scholar
7. Cowley, RA, Gretes, AJ, Soderstrom, CA: Providing safe Med-Evac helicopter transport: Maryland's 18-year experience. M Med J 1988;37:521–524.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Baker, SP, O'Neill, B, Haddon, W et al. : The Injury Severity Score: A method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency art. J Trauma 1974;14:187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Champion, HR, Copes, WS, Sacco, WJ et al. : A new characterization of injury severity. Trauma 1990;5:539–546.Google Scholar
10. Trunkey, DD: The value of trauma centers. Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, October 1982;5–7.Google Scholar
11. Cowley, RA: A study of shock and trauma in man utilizing the resources of a clinical shock trauma unit. MD State Med J 1967;16:53–65.Google ScholarPubMed
12. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Trauma Research, Commission on Life Sciences, Institute of Medicine: Injury in America, A Continuing Public Health Problem. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Eisenberg, MS, Cummins, RO, Damon, S et al. : Survival rates from out of-hospital cardiac arrest: Recommendations for uniform definitions and data to report, Ann Emer Med 1990;19:1249–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Baxt, WG, Moody, P: The impact of a rotorcraft aeromedical emergency care services and trauma mortality. JAMA 1983;249:3047–3051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Baxt, WG, Moody, P, Cleveland, HC: Hospital-based rotorcraft aeromedical emergency care services and trauma mortality: A multicenter study. Ann Emer Med 1985;14:859–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mackenzie, CF, Shin, B, Fisher, R, Cowley, RA: Two year mortality in 760 patients transported by helicopter direct from the road accident scene. Am Surg 1979;45:101–108.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Gabram, SG, Jacobs, LM: The impact of emergency medical helicopters on prehospital care. North Am Clin 1990:85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Schiller, WR, Knox, R, Zinnecher, H et al. : Effect of helicopter transport of trauma victims on survival in an urban trauma center. Trauma 1988;28:1127–1133.Google Scholar
19. Fisher, RP, Flynn, TC, Miller, PW et al. : Urban helicopter response to the scene of injury. J Trauma 1984;24:946–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Champion, HR: Helicopter triage. Emer Care Q 1986;2:13–21.Google Scholar
21. Boyd, CR, Corse, KM, Campbell, RC: Emergency interhospital transport of the major trauma patient: Air vs. ground. J Trauma 1989;29:789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Maryland State Police Aviation Division: 1997 Annual Report. Baltimore, MD: Maryland State Police Aviation Division, 1998, p 3.Google Scholar
23. Wright, SW, Dronen, SC, Combs, TJ, Storer, D: Aeromedical transport of patients with post-traumatic cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1989;7:721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Rhee, KJ, O'Malley, RJ: Indications for air medical transport: General concepts. In: Air Medical Physicians Handbook. Salt Lake City: Air Medical Physicians Association, 1994, pp 1–3.Google Scholar