Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:46:18.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emerging Issues and Future Needs in Humanitarian Assistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Michael J. VanRooyen*
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Steven Hansch
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Donna Curtis
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Gilbert Burnham
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
*
The Johns Hopkins Center for International Emergency, Disaster and Refugee Studies, 1830 E. Monument Street, Suite 6-100, Baltimore, MD 21305, USA Email: mvanrooy@jhmi.edu

Abstract

During the past two decades, there has been tremendous investment in the ability to intervene in disaster settings, and significant barriers remain to providing appropriate services to populations affected by natural and manmade calamities. Many of the barriers to providing effective assistance exist within the NGO community, and illustrate emerging needs for international agencies. These emerging needs include improving methods of recipient participation to promote the local health system, developing improved methods for quality assurance, enhancing options for personnel development, and addressing long-term needs of reconstruction and rehabilitation. Relief agencies face challenges on all levels to develop sound practices in providing humanitarian assistance that can lead to long-term benefits to populations affected by disaster.

Type
Part 1. Complex Emergencies: Lessons Learned
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.de Ville de Goyet, C: Stop propogating disaster myths. Lancet 2000;356(9231):762764.Google Scholar
2.Mitchell, J, Doane, D: An ombudsman for humanitarian assistance? Disasters 1999;23(2):115124.Google Scholar
3.VanRooyen, M, VanRooyen, J, Sloan, EP, Ward, E: Mobile medical relief and military assistance in Somalia. Prehosp Disast Med 1995;10(2):6971.Google Scholar
4.Banatvala, N, Zwi, AB: Public health and humanitarian interventions: Developing the evidence base. BMJ 2000;321:101105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Spiegel, P, Sheik, M, Burnham, G, Woodruff, BA: The accuracy of mortality reporting in displaced persons camps during the post-emergency phase. Disaster, 2001 in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bolton, P: Cross-cultural validity and reliability testing of a standard psychiatric assessment instrument without a gold standard. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2001;189(4):238242.Google Scholar
7.Loevinsohn, BP, Suter, RW, Costales, MO: Using cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate targeting strategies: The case of vitamin A supplementation. Health Policy and Planning 1997;12(1):2937.Google Scholar
8.Griekspoor, A, Sondorp, E, Vos, T: Cost-effectiveness analysis of humanitarian relief interventions: Visceral leishmaniasis treatment in the Sudan. Health Policy and Planning 1999;14(1):7076.Google Scholar
9.World Heatlh Organization: Conflict and Health: Working paper. Presented at the international seminar: Preventing Violent Conflict – The Search for Political Will, Strategies and Effective Took. Krussenberg, 19-20 June 2000.Google Scholar
10.Waldman, R, Martone, G: Public health and complex emergencies: New issues, new conditions. American journal of Public Health 1999;89(10):14831485.Google Scholar
11.Zerrouki, A, Gagnayre, R, Biberson, P: Education of health personnel in the design of humanitarian actions: The experiences of a non-governmental organization. Sante Publique 2000;12(3):355362.Google Scholar
12.Marchand, C, Gagnayre, R, d'Ivernois, JF: Training of health personnel in the framework of humanitarian action: Choosing an assessment model. Sante 1996;6(5):279283.Google Scholar
13.World Health Organization: Stress management in disasters. Health in Emergencies 2001;10:11.Google Scholar
14.Sheik, M, Gutierrez, MI, Bolton, P, Spiegel, P, Thieren, M, Burnham, G: Deaths among humanitarian workers. BMJ 2000;321:166168.Google Scholar
15.Seet, B, Burnham, GM: Fatality trends in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, 1948-1998. JAMA 2000;284:598603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Stein, D, Ayotte, B: East Timor: Extreme deprivation of health and human rights. Lancet 1999;354(9195):2075.Google Scholar
17.Marks, SP: Economic sanctions as human rights violations: Reconciling political and public health imperatives. American Journal of Public Health 1999;10:15091513.Google Scholar
18.Leaning, J: Health and human rights: The BMA's latest handbook on human rights challenges us all. BMJ 2001;322:14351436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Leaning, J, Coupland, R, Nathanson, V: Medicine and international humanitarian law. BMJ 1999;319:393394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.White, P, Cliff, L: Matching response to context in complex political emergencies: ‘Relief’, ‘development’, ‘peace-building’ or something in-between? Disasters 2000;24(4):314342.Google Scholar
21.Macrae, J: Dilemmas of legitimacy, sutainablity, and coherence: Rehabilitating the health sector. In: Kumar, K, (ed), Rebuilding Societies after Civil War. Lynne Reinner: Boulder, 1997.Google Scholar