Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:20:20.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immediate Medical Care Rendered by U.S. Law Enforcement Officers After Officer-Involved Shootings – An Open-Access Public Domain Video Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Audrey Keim
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Sarayna McGuire
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Craig Blakeney
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Shari Brand
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA
Aaron Klassen
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Anuradha Luke
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Steven Maher
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA
Jeffrey Wood
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Matthew Sztajnkrycer
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

After officer-involved shootings, rapid delivery of emergency medical care is critical but may be delayed due to scene safety concerns. The purpose of this study was to describe medical care rendered by law enforcement officers (LEO) after lethal force incidents.

Method:

Retrospective analysis of open-source video footage of officer-involved shootings (OIS) occurring between 2/15/2013 and 12/31/2020. Frequency and nature of care provided, time until LEO and emergency medical services (EMS) care, and mortality outcomes were evaluated. The study was deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.

Results:

342 videos were included in the final analysis. LEOs rendered care in 172 (50.3%) incidents. The average elapsed time from the time of injury to LEO-provided care was 155.8 + 198.8 seconds. Hemorrhage control was the most common intervention performed. An average of 214.2 seconds elapsed between LEO care and EMS arrival. No mortality difference was identified between LEO vs EMS care (p = 0.1631). Subjects with truncal wounds were more likely to die than those with extremity wounds (p < 0.00001).

Conclusion:

LEO rendered medical care in half of all OIS incidents, initiating care on average 3.5 minutes prior to EMS arrival. Although no significant mortality difference was noted for LEO versus EMS care, this finding must be interpreted cautiously, as specific interventions, such as extremity hemorrhage control, may have impacted select patients. Future studies are needed to determine optimal LEO care for these patients.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine