Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:23:34.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Medical Response of a Physician and Two Nurses to the Mass-Casualty Event Resulting in the Phi Phi Islands from the Tsunami

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Surasak Ammartyothin
Affiliation:
Head of Phi Phi Island Hospital, Thailand
Issac Ashkenasi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel Medical Services and Supply Center, Israel Defense Forces Medical Corps (IDF), Israel IDF Home Front Command, Israel
Dagan Schwartz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Adi Leiba
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel IDF Home Front Command, Israel
Guy Nakash
Affiliation:
IDF Home Front Command, Israel
Rami Pelts
Affiliation:
IDF Home Front Command, Israel
Avishay Goldberg
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Yaron Bar-Dayan*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel IDF Home Front Command, Israel
*
Col. Y. Bar-Dayan, MD, MHA Chief Medical Officer, IDF Home Front Command, 16 Dolev St. Neve Savion, Or-Yehuda ISRAEL E-mail: bardayan@netvision.net.il

Abstract

The Phi Phi Islands are isolated islands located about one hour by ship from the mainland in Krabi province of Thailand. There is a small medical facility where the director is the one physician that provides care to residents and tourists. This small medical facility faced an enormous mass casualty incident due to the 2004 Tsunami. The hospital was damaged by the Tsunami wave and was not functional, one crew member died and another was injured. Medical care and evacuation posed a unique problem in the Phi Phi Islands due to remoteness, limited medical resources, lack of effective communication with the main land and the large number of victims. An alternative medical facility was located in a nearby hotel. The crew included the medical director, two nurses, two additional staff members, 10 local volunteers, and hotel staff members. The medical crew had to treat 600–700 casualties in 24 hours. Most of the victims were mildly injured, but approximately 100 (15%) of the victims could not walk due to their injuries. The medical director, made a conscious decision to initially treat only circulation (“C”) problems, by con- trolling external hemorrhages. This decision was driven by the lack of equip- ment and personnel to deal with airway (“A”) and breathing (“B”) problems.

In the post-disaster debriefing, the Phi Phi Island hospital physician noted five major lessons concerning disaster management in such extreme situation in a small facility located in a remote area: (1) effective resistant communica- tion facilities must be ensured; (2) clear, simple “evacuation plans” should be made in advance; (3) plans should be made to ensure automatic reinforcement of remote areas with evacuation vehicles, medical equipment and medical personnel; (4) efficient cooperation with medical volunteers must be planned and drilled; and (5) every team member of such a hospital must participate in an educational program and periodic drills should be done to improve the dis- aster and emergency medicine capabilities.

This case report is an example for caregivers all over the world, of an amazing lesson of leadership and courage.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Life Support for Doctors, 7th Edition. Chicago, American College of Surgeons: 2004.Google Scholar
2.Watttanawaitunechai, C., Peacock, SJ, Jitpartoom, P: Tsunami in Thailand— Disaster management in district hospital. N Eng J Med 2005;352(10):962964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Rapid health response, assessment, and surveillance after a tsunami—Thailand, 2004–2005. MMWR 2005;54(3):6164.Google Scholar
4.Bar-Dayan, Y, Peltz, R, Ashkenasi, I, Shushan, O, Schwartz, D, Nakash, G, Levi, Y, Goldberg, A: Support factors of the healthcare teams in the affected areas of Thailand—Lessons learned from the 26 December 2004 Tsunami. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(3):s119–s120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar