Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:09:44.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model for Evaluation of Disaster Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Edmund M. Ricci
Edmund M. Ricci
Affiliation:
From the Graduate School of Public Health and the Resuscitation Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh PA 15260, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our ability to manage disaster relief activities at regional, national or international levels of socio-political organization has, according to many analysts, not kept pace with the knowledge and technical capability presently available to contend with disasters. In a report released in 1977 a panel of experts assembled by the United Nations Association characterized disaster relief efforts as being routinely mismanaged. For example, the panel described what has been considered one of the better organized disaster relief efforts (the 1976 earthquake in Guatamala) in the following way.

Type
Part I: Research-Education-Organization
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 1 , supplement S1: Disaster Resuscitology , 1985 , pp. 30 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. United Nations-USA Policy Studies Panel on International Disaster Relief: Act of Nature, Acts of Man: The Global Response to Natural Disasters. New York, NY: United Nations Association 1977, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
2. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences: Field Studies of Disaster Behavior: Disaster Research Group, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. (Publication 886), 1961.Google Scholar
3. Suchman, E. Evaluative research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1967.Google Scholar
4. Ricci, E et al. A methodology for field research. Pittsburgh Health Services Research Unit Monograph Series, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, 1981.Google Scholar