Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:50:24.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A National Framework for Disaster Health Education in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Gerard J. FitzGerald*
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QueenslandAustralia
Peter Aitken
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Townsville, QueenslandAustralia
Paul Arbon
Affiliation:
Finders University, Adelaide, South AustraliaAustralia
Frank Archer
Affiliation:
Monash University, Melbourne, VictoriaAustralia
David Cooper
Affiliation:
Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South WalesAustralia
Peter Leggat
Affiliation:
James Cook University, Townsville, QueenslandAustralia
Colin Myers
Affiliation:
Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QueenslandAustralia
Andrew Robertson
Affiliation:
Department of Health Western Australia, Australia
Michael Tarrant
Affiliation:
Emergency Management Australia, Australia
Elinor R. Davis
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QueenslandAustralia
*
Professor of Public HealthSchool of Public HealthQueensland University of TechnologyVictoria Park RoadKelvin Grove, Queensland 4059Australia E-mail: gj.fitzgerald@qut.edu.au

Abstract

Introduction:

Recent events have heightened awareness of disaster health issues and the need to prepare the health workforce to plan for and respond to major incidents. This has been reinforced at an international level by the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine, which has proposed an international educational framework.

Objective:

The aim of this paper is to outline the development of a national educational framework for disaster health in Australia.

Methods:

The framework was developed on the basis of the literature and the previous experience of members of a National Collaborative for Disaster Health Education and Research. The Collaborative was brought together in a series of workshops and teleconferences, utilizing a modified Delphi technique to finalize the content at each level of the framework and to assign a value to the inclusion of that content at the various levels.

Framework:

The framework identifies seven educational levels along with educational outcomes for each level. The framework also identifies the recommended contents at each level and assigns a rating of depth for each component. The framework is not intended as a detailed curriculum, but rather as a guide for educationalists to develop specific programs at each level.

Conclusions:

This educational framework will provide an infrastructure around which future educational programs in Disaster Health in Australia may be designed and delivered. It will permit improved articulation for students between the various levels and greater consistency between programs so that operational responders may have a consistent language and operational approach to the management of major events.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Archer, F, Seynaeve, G: International guidelines and standards for education and training to reduce the consequences of events that may threaten the health status of a community. Prehosp Disaster Med 2007;22:120130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.World Health Organization: Health Action in Crisis. In: Events HAC Forum. HAC vision and strategic direction. Available at http://www.who.int/hac/events/DGR_presentation.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2008.Google Scholar
3.Subbarao, I, Lyznicki, J, Edbert, B, et al. : A Consensus-based educational framework and competency set for the discipline of disaster medicine and public health preparedness. Disast Med Public Health Prep 2008;2(1):5768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Cummings, GE, Della Corte, F: Designing a curriculum in disaster medicine for Canadian medical schools. Int J Dis Med 2004;2:135147.Google Scholar
5.Sundnes, KO, Birnbaum, ML: Health disaster management: Guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein Style. Prehosp Disaster Med 2003;7(3):s1–s14.Google Scholar
6.Bloom, B, Hastings, JT, Madavs, GF: Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971.Google Scholar
7.An Overview of the Australian Qualifications Framework, AQI Implementation Handbook, 4th Edition, Australian Qualifications Framework Advisory Board to MCEETYA 2007.Google Scholar
8.Bradt, D, Abraham, K, Franks, R: A Strategic plan for Disaster Medicine in Australasia. Emerg Med 2003;5:271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.The Education Committee Working Group of the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine: International standards and guidelines on education and training for the multi-disciplinary health response, An issues paper. Prehosp Disaster Med 2004;19(3):186187.Google Scholar