Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:51:47.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of Coping in Children Exposed to Mass Trauma: Measurement Tools, Coping Styles, and Clinical Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2016

Betty Pfefferbaum*
Affiliation:
Terrorism and Disaster Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Pascal Nitiéma
Affiliation:
Terrorism and Disaster Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Anne K. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Terrorism and Disaster Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Mary A. Noffsinger
Affiliation:
Terrorism and Disaster Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA Courtroom Sciences, Inc., Irving, Texas, USA
Leslie H. Wind
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Orange County Academic Center, University of Southern California, Irvine, California USA
Sandra F. Allen
Affiliation:
Terrorism and Disaster Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
*
Correspondence: Betty Pfefferbaum, MD, JD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences College of Medicine University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center P.O. Box 26901, WP 3417 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA 73126-0901 E-mail: betty-pfefferbaum@ouhsc.edu

Abstract

Evidence-based practice requires the use of data grounded in theory with clear conceptualization and reliable and valid measurement. Unfortunately, developing a knowledge base regarding children’s coping in the context of disasters, terrorism, and war has been hampered by a lack of theoretical consensus and a virtual absence of rigorous test construction, implementation, and evaluation. This report presents a comprehensive review of measurement tools assessing child and adolescent coping in the aftermath of mass trauma, with a particular emphasis on coping dimensions identified through factor analytic procedures. Coping measurement and issues related to the assessment of coping are reviewed. Concepts important in instrument development and psychometric features of coping measures used in disasters, terrorism, and war are presented. The relationships between coping dimensions and both youth characteristics and clinical outcomes also are presented. A discussion of the reviewed findings highlights the difficulty clinicians may experience when trying to integrate the inconsistencies in coping dimensions across studies. Incorporating the need for multiple informants and the difference between general and context-specific coping measures suggests the importance of a multilevel, theoretical conceptualization of coping and thus, the use of more advanced statistical measures. Attention also is given to issues deemed important for further exploration in child disaster coping research.

Pfefferbaum B, Nitiéma P, Jacobs AK, Noffsinger MA, Wind LH, Allen SF. Review of Coping in Children Exposed to Mass Trauma: Measurement Tools, Coping Styles, and Clinical Implications. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(2):169–180.

Type
Comprehensive Review
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Frydenberg, E. The measure of coping. In: Frydenberg E, (ed). Adolescent Coping. Theoretical and research perspectives. New York, New York USA: Rutledge; 1997: 49-66.Google Scholar
2. Frydenberg, E, Lewis, R. Adolescent Coping Scale (ACS). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research; 1993.Google Scholar
3. Tatar, M, Amram, S. Israeli adolescents’ coping strategies in relation to terrorist attacks. Br J Guid Counsel. 2007;35(2):164-173.Google Scholar
4. Carver, CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Moscardino, U, Scrimin, S, Capello, F, Altoé, G, Axia, G. Psychological adjustment of adolescents 18 months after the terrorist attack in Beslan, Russia. A cross-sectional study. J Clin Psychiatr. 2008;69(5):854-859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Pat-Horenczyk, R, Qasrawi, R, Lesack, R, et al. Posttraumatic symptoms, functional impairment, and coping among adolescents on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: a cross-cultural approach. Appl Psychol Int Rev. 2009;58(4):688-708.Google Scholar
7. Stratta, P, Capanna, C, Dell’Osso, L, et al. Resilience and coping in trauma spectrum symptoms prediction: a structural equation modeling approach. Pers Individ Diff. 2015;77:55-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Prinstein, MJ, LaGreca, AM, Vernberg, EM, Silverman, WK. Children’s coping assistance: how parents, teachers, and friends help children cope after a natural disaster. J Clin Child Psychol. 1996;25(4):463-475.Google Scholar
9. Carver, CS, Scheier, MF, Weintraub, JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Person Social Psychol. 1989;56(2):267-283.Google Scholar
10. Zeidner, M. Contextual and personal predictors of adaptive outcomes under terror attack: the case of Israeli adolescents. J Youth Adolesc. 2005;34(5):459-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Zeidner, M. Coping with disaster: the case of Israeli adolescents under threat of missile attack. J Youth Adolesc. 1993;22(1):89-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Schiff, M. Living in the shadow of terrorism: psychological distress and alcohol use among religious and non-religious adolescents in Jerusalem. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(9):2301-2312.Google Scholar
13. Boehnke, K, Macpherson, MJ, Meador, M, Petri, H. How West German adolescents experience the nuclear threat. Political Psychol. 1989;10(3):419-443.Google Scholar
14. Ayers, TS, Sandler, IN, West, SG, Roosa, MW. A dispositional and situational assessment of children’s coping: testing alternative models of coping. J Personality. 1996;64(4):923-958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Paasivirta, ME, Duarte, CS, Wu, P, et al. Factor structure of the Youth Coping in Traumatic Times (YCITT) scale. Psychiatr Res. 2010;179(3):357-362.Google Scholar
16. Spirito, A, Stark, LJ, Williams, C. Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. J Ped Psychol. 1988;13(4):389-407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Vigna, JF, Hernandez, BC, Kelley, ML, Gresham, FM. Coping behavior in hurricane affected African American youth: psychometric properties of the Kidcope. J Black Psychol. 2010;36(1):98-121.Google Scholar
18. Vernberg, EM, La Greca, AM, Silverman, WK, Prinstein, MJ. Prediction of posttraumatic stress symptoms in children after Hurricane Andrew. J Abnor Psychol. 1996;105(2):237-248.Google Scholar
19. Papadatou, D, Giannopoulou, I, Bitsakou, P, Bellali, T, Talias, MA, Tselepi, K. Adolescents’ reactions after a wildfire disaster in Greece. J Trauma Stress. 2012;25(1):57-63.Google Scholar
20. Connor-Smith, JK, Compas, BE, Wadsworth, ME, Thomsen, AH, Saltzman, H. Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(6):976-992.Google Scholar
21. Wadsworth, ME, Gudmundsen, GR, Raviv, T, et al. Coping with terrorism: age and gender differences in effortful and involuntary responses to September 11th. Appl Dev Sci. 2004;8(3):143-157.Google Scholar
22. Benson, MA, Compas, BE, Layne, CM, et al. Measurement of post-war coping and stress responses: a study of Bosnian adolescents. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2011;32(6):323-335.Google Scholar
23. Ryan-Wenger, NM. Development and psychometric properties of the Schoolagers’ Coping Strategies Inventory. Nursing Res. 1990;39(6):344-349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Baráth, Á. Children’s well-being after the war in Kosovo: survey in 2000. Croatian Med J. 2002;43(2):199-208.Google Scholar
25. Hoffner, C, Haefner, MJ. Children’s strategies for coping with news coverage of the Gulf War. Comm Res Rep. 1993;10(2):171-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Weisenberg, M, Schwarzwald, J, Waysman, M, Solomon, Z, Klingman, A. Coping of school-age children in the sealed room during Scud missile bombardment and postwar stress reactions. J Con Clin Psychol. 1993;61(3):462-467.Google Scholar
27. Punamäki, RL, Puhakka, T. Determinants and effectiveness of children’s coping with political violence. Int J Behav Dev. 1997;21(2):349-370.Google Scholar
28 Rotter, JB, Rafferty, JE. Manual: The Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank. New York, New York USA: Psychological Corporation; 1950.Google Scholar
29. Duraković-Belko, E, Kulenović, A, Ðapić, R. Determinants of posttraumatic adjustment in adolescents from Sarajevo who experienced war. J Clin Psychol. 2003;59(1):27-40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. Eur J Person. 1987;1(3):141-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Compas, BE, Connor-Smith, JK, Saltzman, H, Thomsen, AH, Wadsworth, ME. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(1):87-127.Google Scholar
32. Cole, PM, Bruschi, CJ, Tamang, BL. Cultural differences in children’s emotional reactions to difficult situations. Child Dev. 2002;73(3):983-996.Google Scholar
33. Langley, AK, Jones, RT. Coping efforts and efficacy, acculturation, and post-traumatic symptomatology in adolescents following wildfire. Fire Technol. 2005;41(2):125-143.Google Scholar
34. Bryant, FB. Assessing the validity of measurement. In: Grimm LG, Yarnold PR, (eds). Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics. Washington, DC USA: American Psychological Association; 2000: 99-146.Google Scholar
35. Costello, AB, Osborne, JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1-9.Google Scholar
36. Fabrigar, LR, Wegener, DT, MacCallum, RC, Strahan, EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Meth. 1999;4(3):272-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Skinner, EA, Edge, K, Altman, J, Sherwood, H. Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(2):216-269.Google Scholar
38. MacCallum, RC, Widaman, KF, Zhang, S, Hong, S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Meth. 1999;4(1):84-99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Osborne, JW, Fitzpatrick, DC. Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: what it is and why it makes your analysis better. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17(15):1-8.Google Scholar
40. Meredith, W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58(4):525-543.Google Scholar
41. Wu, AD, Li, Z, Zumbo, BD. Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factory analysis: a demonstration with TIMSS data. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(3):1-26.Google Scholar
42. Skinner, EA, Zimmer-Gembeck, MJ. The development of coping. Ann Rev Psychol. 2007;58(1):119-144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Saylor, C, Deroma, V. Assessment of children and adolescents exposed to disaster. In: La Greca AM, Silverman WK, Vernberg EM, Roberts MC, (eds). Helping Children Cope with Disasters and Terrorism. Washington, DC USA: American Psychological Association; 2002: 35-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Balaban, V. Psychological assessment of children in disasters and emergencies. Disasters. 2006;30(2):178-198.Google Scholar
45. Finch, AJ, Daugherty, TK. Issues in the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder in children. In: Saylor CF, (ed). Children and Disasters. New York, New York USA: Plenum Press; 1993: 45-66.Google Scholar
46. Yule, W, Williams, RM. Post-traumatic stress reactions in children. J Trauma Stress. 1990;3(2):279-295.Google Scholar
47. Jeney-Gammon, P, Daugherty, TK, Finch, AJ Jr., Belter, RW, Foster, KY. Children’s coping styles and report of depressive symptoms following a natural disaster. J Genetic Psychol. 1993;154(2):259-267.Google Scholar
48. La Greca, AM, Silverman, WK, Vernberg, EM, Prinstein, MJ. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress in children after Hurricane Andrew: a prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996;64(4):712-723.Google Scholar
49. Pfefferbaum, B, North, CS. Research with children exposed to disasters. Int J Meth Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(S2):S49-S56.Google Scholar
50. Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, New York USA: Springer Publishing; 1984.Google Scholar
51. Ayers, TS, Sandler, IN. Manual for the Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist & the How I Coped Under Pressure Scale. Tempe, Arizona USA: Arizona State University Program for Prevention Research; 1999.Google Scholar
52. Lengua, LJ, Long, AC, Meltzoff, AN. Pre-attack stress-load, appraisals, and coping in children’s responses to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2006;47(12):1219-1227.Google Scholar
53. Knapp, LG, Stark, LJ, Kurkjian, JA, Spirito, A. Assessing coping in children and adolescents: research and practice. Educ Psychol Rev. 1991;3(4):309-334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Pfefferbaum, B, Weems, CF, Scott, BG, et al. Research methods in child disaster studies: a review of studies generated by the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Attacks; the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami; and Hurricane Katrina. Child Youth Care Forum. 2013;42(4):285-337.Google Scholar
55. Braun-Lewensohn, O. Coping and social support in children exposed to mass trauma. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2015;17(46):1-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. Schwarzer, R, Schwarzer, C. A critical survey of coping instruments. In: Zeidner N, Endler MS, (eds). Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. New York, New York USA: Wiley; 1996: 107-132.Google Scholar