Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:44:17.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Terrorism in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Pierre Carli ,
Caroline Telion  and
David Baker
Pierre Carli*
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
Caroline Telion
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
David Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
*
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, SAMU de Paris, Hôpital Necker, Paris, 75015 France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

France has experienced two waves of major terrorist bombings since 1980. In the first wave (1985–1986), eight bombings occurred in Paris, killing 13 and injuring 281. In the second wave (1995–1996), six bombings occurred in Paris and Lyon, killing 10 and injuring 262. Based on lessons learned during these events, France has developed and improved a sophisticated national system for prehospital emergency response to conventional terrorist attacks based on its national emergency medical services (EMS) system, Service d' Aide Medicale Urgente (SAMU). According to the national plan for the emergency medical response to mass-casualty events (White Plan), the major phases of EMS response are: (1) alert; (2) search and rescue; (3) triage of victims and provision of critical care to first priority victims; (4) regulated dispatch of victims to hospitals; and (5) psychological assistance.

Following the 1995 Tokyo subway sarin attack, a national plan for the emergency response to chemical and biological events (PIRATOX) was implemented. In 2002, the Ministries of Health and the Interior collaborated to produce a comprehensive national plan (BIOTOX) for the emergency response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear events. Key aspects of BIOTOX are the prehospital provision of specialized advance life support for toxic injuries and the protection of responders in contaminated environments. BIOTOX was successfully used during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in France.

Keywords

biologicalchemicalEMS systemFrancehospitalsmedical carenuclearphysicianspreparednessradiologicalresponseSAMUterrorismtriage
Type
Special Reports
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 18 , Special Issue 2: Terrorism-I: Country Reports , June 2003 , pp. 92 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Carli, P, Riou, B, Barriot, P: Trauma Anesthesia in France. In; Grande, C (ed): Textbook of Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993. pp 199–205.Google Scholar
2. Carli, PA: Prehospital intervention for trauma: Helpful or harmful? The European point of view. Cur Op in Crit Care 1998; 4: 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Leibovici, D, Gofrit on, Stein, M, et al: Blast injuries: Bus versus open-air bombings. A comparative study in survivors of open air versus confined-space explosions. J Trauma 1996; 41: 1030–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Baker, DJ: Management of casualties from terrorist chemical and biological attack: A key role for the anaesthetist. Brit J Anaesth 2002; 89: 211–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Bozeman, WP, Dilbero, D, Schauben, JL: Biologic and chemical weapons of mass destruction. Emerg Med Clin N Am 2002; 20: 975–993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Carli, P, Telion, C: Focus on prehospital and emergency trauma care in disaster medicine. Preshospital care on scene. Current Anesthesia and Critical Care 1998; 9: 74–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Leibovici, D, Gofrit, ON, Heruti, RJ, et al: Interhospital patient transfer: A quality improvement indicator for prehospital triage in mass casualties. Am J Emerg Med 1997; 15: 341–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Baker, DJ: Management of respiratory failure in toxic disasters. Resuscitation 1999; 42: 125–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Abraham, RB, Rudick, V, Weinbroun, AA: Practical guidelines for acute care of victims of bioterrorism: Conventional injuries and concomitant nerve agent intoxication. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 989–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Baker, DJ: Advanced life support for toxic injuries (TOXALS). Eur J Emerg Med 1996; 3: 327–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Okumura, T, Takasu, N, Ishimatsu, S, et al: Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28: 129–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Okumura, T, Suzuki, K, Fukada, A, et al: The Tokyo subway sarin attack. Disaster management, Part 2: Hospital response. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5:618–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Borio, L, Frank, D, Mani, V: Death due to bioterrorism-related anthrax. Report of two patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 2554–2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar