Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:43:52.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trauma System Development and Future Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Judith B. Braslow*
Affiliation:
Division of Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Bureau of Health Resources Development, Health Resources and Services Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
Joan A. Snyder
Affiliation:
Division of Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, Bureau of Health Resources Development, Health Resources and Services Administration, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.
*
Division of Trauma and Emergency, Medical Systems, 11A22 Parklawn, Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857USA

Abstract

Traumatic injury, both unintentional and intentional, is a serious public health problem. Trauma care systems play a significant role in reducing mortality, morbidity, and disability due to injuries. However, barriers to the provision of prompt and appropriate emergency medical services still exist in many areas of the United States. Title XII of the Public Health Service Act provides for programs in support of trauma care planning and system development by states and localities. This legislation includes provisions for: 1) grants to state agencies to modify the trauma care component of the state Emergency Medical Services (EMS) plan; 2) grants to improve the quality and availability of trauma care in rural areas; 3) development of a Model Trauma Care System Plan for states to use as a guide in trauma system development; and 4) the establishment of a National Advisory Council on Trauma Care Systems.

Type
Special Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. National Research Council, Committee on Trauma Research: Injury in America: A Continuing Public Health Problem. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
2. Shackford, S, Hollingsworth-Fridlund, P, Cooper, G, et al. : The effect of regionalizalion upon quality of trauma care as assessed by concurrent audit before and after institution of a trauma system: A preliminary report. Trauma 1986;26:812820.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Alexander, R, Pons, P, Krischer, J, Hunt, P: The effect of advanced life support and sophisticated hospital systems on motor vehicle mortality. Trauma 1986;24:486489.Google Scholar
4. Cales, R, Trunkey, D: Preventable trauma deaths: A review of trauma care systems development. JAMA 1985;254:10591063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. West, J, Cales, R, Gazzaniga, A: Impact of regionalization. Arch Surgery 1983;118:740744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. West, J, Trunkey, D, Lim, R: Systems of trauma care: A study of two countries. 1979;114:455460.Google Scholar
7. Pollack, M, Alexander, S, Clarke, N, et al. : Improved outcomes from tertiary center pediatric intensive care: A statewide comparison of tertiary and nontertiary facilities. Crit Care Med 1991;19:150159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Cooper, A, Barlow, B, DiScala, C, et al. : Efficacy of pediatric trauma care: Results of a population based study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, in press.Google Scholar
9. Trauma Care Systems Planning and Development Act of 1990. U.S. Public Law 101590.Google Scholar