Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:07:30.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Job dissatisfaction and early retirement: a qualitative study of general practitioners in the Northern Deanery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

John Newton
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Anna Luce
Affiliation:
School of Health Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Tim van Zwanenberg
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Dentistry, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Jenny Firth-Cozens
Affiliation:
Centre for Clinical Psychology and Healthcare Research, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Early retirement has become an important labour market trend for workers in professional occupations. General practitioners (GPs), however, are in short supply, and are being encouraged by the government to stay at work beyond the age of 60. In this study, which followed up a questionnaire survey of all general practitioners over 44 working in the Northern Deanery, 21 GPs took part in semi-structured interviews looking at their plans, reasons for, and feelings about, retirement. Interviews were taped, transcribed, and the text coded using themes from the interview schedule and those derived from the data. Findings are reported using a qualitative distinction between ‘happy’ and ‘unhappy’ doctors and on this basis just over two-fifths of those interviewed were ‘unhappy’, all of whom wanted to take early retirement. The major factor influencing these plans to retire was dissatisfaction with their role and none of this group would be persuaded to change their minds by various incentives such as ‘golden handcuffs’. ‘Happy’ doctors who wanted to stay in practice had found ways of accommodating themselves to change and factors outside of work provided no incentive or ‘pull’. This was not the case for ‘happy’ doctors who wanted to leave: they wanted to pursue hobbies and other interests whilst they were young enough to do so. The paper concludes that change is a major factor producing job dissatisfaction among GPs and that future generations of doctors need to be equipped with the means to cope with it, while governments need to consider the merits of stability and continuity.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2004 Arnold