Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:04:32.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of ‘think aloud’ technique, information processing theory and schema theory to explain decision-making processes of general practitioners and nurse practitioners using patient scenarios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2006

Maxine Offredy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
Elizabeth Meerabeau
Affiliation:
School of Health University of Greenwich, Eltham, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper focuses on one aspect of a research study exploring the cognitive processes of decision making by 11 nurse practitioners and 11 general practitioners from the south east of England, using six patient scenarios during 2000. It sets out to explain some of their decision-making processes. This paper is part of a larger study discussing the use of information processing theory as a framework for exploring decision-making. Schema theory is used to provide explanation of correct and incorrect responses to the six scenarios. The paper explores areas in which cognitive overlap occurs and uses the participants’ examples to illustrate schema functioning. The usefulness of information processing theory to explore decision-making by nurse practitioners is also addressed. The paper concludes by suggesting that information processing theory and ‘think aloud’ approaches were suitable for identifying errors in decision-making, and could therefore be used as a teaching tool. Change is required in the culture of primary care organizations if shifting emphasis towards developing collective responsibility and greater openness is to be achieved.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2005 Arnold