Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:14:22.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON EXTROPY PROPERTIES AND DISCRIMINATION INFORMATION OF DIFFERENT STRATIFIED SAMPLING SCHEMES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2021

Abbas Eftekharian Open the ORCID record for Abbas Eftekharian [Opens in a new window]  and
Guoxin Qiu
Abbas Eftekharian
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, School of Basic Sciences, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran E-mail: eftekharian@hormozgan.ac.ir
Guoxin Qiu
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Xinhua University of Anhui, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China Department of Statistics and Finance, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ranked set sampling (RSS) and some of its variants are sampling designs that are applied widely in different areas. When the underlying population contains different subpopulations, we can use stratified ranked set sampling (SRSS) which combines the advantages of stratification with RSS. In the present paper, we consider the information content of SRSS in terms of extropy measure. Some results using stochastic orders properties are obtained. The effect of imperfect ranking on discrimination information is analytically investigated. It is proved that discrimination information between the perfect SRSS and simple random sampling (SRS) data sets performs better than that of between the imperfect SRSS and SRS data sets.

Keywords

discrimination informationextropyimperfect rankingstratified ranked set sampling
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 644 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, A., Alzaid, A., Bartoszewicz, J., & Kochar, S. (1986). Dispersive and superadditive ordering. Advances in Applied Probability 18(4): 1019–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, L.L. & Wolfe, D.A. (1994). The effect of imperfect judgment rankings on properties of procedures based on the ranked-set samples analog of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon statistic. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89(425): 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Bai, Z., & Sinha, B (2003). Ranked set sampling: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Eskandarzadeh, M., Crescenzo, A.D., & Tahmasebi, S. (2018). Measures of information for maximum ranked set sampling with unequal samples. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 47(19): 4692–4709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, J. (2014). A note on Fisher information and imperfect ranked-set sampling. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 43(13): 2726–2733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahanshahi, S., Zarei, H., & Khammar, A. (2019). On cumulative residual extropy. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences. doi:10.1017/S0269964819000196.Google Scholar
Jozani, M.J. & Ahmadi, J. (2014). On uncertainty and information properties of ranked set samples. Information Sciences 264: 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lad, F., Sanfilippo, G., Agro, G. (2015). Extropy: complementary dual of entropy. Statistical Science 30(1): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, G. (1952). A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Crop and Pasture Science 3(4): 385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. & Lim, J. (2012). On the effect of imperfect ranking on the amount of Fisher information in ranked set samples. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 41(19): 3608–3620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, G. (2017). The extropy of order statistics and record values. Statistics & Probability Letters 120: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, G. & Eftekharian, A. (2020). Extropy information of maximum and minimum ranked set sampling with unequal samples. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1678640.Google Scholar
Qiu, G., Wang, L., & Wang, X. (2019). On extropy properties of mixed systems. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 33(3): 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raqab, M.Z. & Qiu, G. (2019). On extropy properties of ranked set sampling. Statistics 53(1): 210–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samawi, H.M. (1996). Stratified ranked set sample. Pakistan Journal of Statistics – All Series 12: 9–16.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G (2007). Stochastic orders. Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahmasebi, S., Longobardi, M., Kazemi, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2020). Cumulative Tsallis entropy for maximum ranked set sampling with unequal samples. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vock, M. & Balakrishnan, N. (2011). A Jonckheere–Terpstra-type test for perfect ranking in balanced ranked set sampling. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141(2): 624–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar