Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:24:46.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RELATIONS BETWEEN STOCHASTIC ORDERINGS AND GENERALIZED STOCHASTIC PRECEDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2015

Emilio De Santis ,
Fabio Fantozzi  and
Fabio Spizzichino
Emilio De Santis
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University La Sapienza Rome E-mails: desantis@mat.uniroma1.it; fantozzi@mat.uniroma1.it; spizzich@mat.uniroma1.it
Fabio Fantozzi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University La Sapienza Rome E-mails: desantis@mat.uniroma1.it; fantozzi@mat.uniroma1.it; spizzich@mat.uniroma1.it
Fabio Spizzichino
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University La Sapienza Rome E-mails: desantis@mat.uniroma1.it; fantozzi@mat.uniroma1.it; spizzich@mat.uniroma1.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of stochastic precedence between two real-valued random variables has often emerged in different applied frameworks. In this paper, we analyze several aspects of a more general, and completely natural, concept of stochastic precedence that also had appeared in the literature. In particular, we study the relations with the notions of stochastic ordering. Such a study leads us to introducing some special classes of bivariate copulas. Motivations for our study can arise from different fields. In particular, we consider the frame of Target-Based Approach in decisions under risk. This approach has been mainly developed under the assumption of stochastic independence between “Prospects” and “Targets”. Our analysis concerns the case of stochastic dependence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 329 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arcones, M.A., Kvam, P.H. & Samaniego, F.J. (2002). Nonparametric estimation of a distribution subject to a stochastic precedence constraint. Journal of American Statistical Association 97(457): 170–182.Google Scholar
2. Billingsley, P. (2009). Convergence of Probability Measures. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
3. Boland, P.J., Singh, H. & Cukic, B. (2004). The stochastic precedence ordering with applications in sampling and testing. Journal of Applied Probabability 41(1): 73–82.Google Scholar
4. Bordley, R. & LiCalzi, M. (2000). Decision analysis using targets instead of utility functions. Decisions in Economics and Finance 23(1): 53–74.Google Scholar
5. Castagnoli, E. & LiCalzi, M. (1996). Expected utility without utility. Theory and Decision 41(3): 281–301.Google Scholar
6. De Santis, E. & Spizzichino, F. (2004). Change-point models and conditionally pure birth processes: An inequality on the stochastic intensity. Journal of Applied Probability 41(4): pp. 939–952.Google Scholar
7. De Santis, E. & Spizzichino, F. (2012). First occurrence of a word among the elements of a finite dictionary in random sequences of letters. Electronic Journal of Probability 17: 1–9.Google Scholar
8. De Santis, E. & Spizzichino, F. (2012). Stochastic comparisons between first-passage times for Markov chains. arXiv:1210.1116 [math.PR], pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
9. Durante, F., Klement, E.P., Sempi, C. & Úbeda-Flores, M. (2010). Measures of non-exchangeability for bivariate random vectors. Statistical Papers 51(3): 687–699.Google Scholar
10. Joe, H. (1997) Multivariate Models and Multivariate Dependence Concepts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
11. Kamihigashi, T. & Stachurski, J. (2014). Partial stochastic dominance. Technical Report.Google Scholar
12. Muliere, P. & Scarsini, M. (1987). Characterization of a Marshall–Olkin type class of distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 39(2): 429–441.Google Scholar
13. Navarro, J. & Rubio, R. (2010). Comparisons of coherent systems using stochastic precedence. TEST 19: 469–486.Google Scholar
14. Navarro, J. & Spizzichino, F. (2010). On the relationships between copulas of order statistics and marginal distributions. Statistics & probability Letters 80(5): 473–479.Google Scholar
15. Nelsen, R. (2006). An Introduction to Copulas. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
16. Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
17. Scarsini, M. (1985). A note on bernoulli's principle and probability dominance. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 47(1): 109–113.Google Scholar
18. Sempi, C. (2004). Convergence of copulas: critical remarks. Radov Matematicki 12(2): 241–249.Google Scholar
19. Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
20. Strassen, V. (1965). The existence of probability measures with given marginals. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36: 423–439.Google Scholar
21. Wrather, C. & Yu, P. (1982). Probability dominance in random outcomes. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 36(3): 315–334.Google Scholar