Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:32:58.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SIGNATURES OF MULTI-STATE SYSTEMS BASED ON A SERIES/PARALLEL/RECURRENT STRUCTURE OF MODULES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2021

He Yi Open the ORCID record for He Yi [Opens in a new window] ,
Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan  and
Xiang Li
He Yi
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China E-mail: yihe@mail.buct.edu.cn
Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4K1, Ontario, Canada E-mail: bala@mcmaster.ca
Xiang Li
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China E-mail: lixiang@mail.buct.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we consider multi-state coherent systems that can be regarded as a series/parallel/recurrent connection of multi-state modules with binary/multi-state components. The multi-state (survival) signatures of such systems are presented in terms of multi-state (survival) signatures of related modules based on the structures. For a recurrent structure, the multi-state survival signature of the structure is also needed. The results established here are finally illustrated with a number of examples.

Keywords

multi-state coherent systemmulti-state modulemulti-state (survival) signatureseries/parallel/recurrent connection
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 824 - 850
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashrafi, S. & Asadi, M. (2014). Dynamic reliability modeling of three-state networks. Journal of Applied Probability 51(4): 999–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashrafi, S. & Asadi, M. (2015). On the stochastic and dependence properties of the three-state systems. Metrika 78(3): 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, N. & Volterman, W. (2014). On the signatures of ordered system lifetimes. Journal of Applied Probability 51(1): 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P.J. (2001). Signatures of indirect majority systems. Journal of Applied Probability 38(2): 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boland, P.J. & Samaniego, F.J. (2004). The signature of a coherent system and its applications in reliability. In Soyer, R., Mazzuchi, T.A., & Singpurwalla, N.D. (eds), Mathematical reliability: an expository perspective. New York: Springer, pp. 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coolen, F.P.A. & Coolen-Maturi, T. (2012). Generalizing the signature to systems with multiple types of components. In Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., & Kacprzyk, J. (eds), Complex systems and dependability. New York: Springer, pp. 115–130.Google Scholar
Coolen-Maturi, T., Coolen, F., & Balakrishnan, N. (2021). The joint survival signature of coherent systems with shared components. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 207: 107350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, G.F., Chan, P.S., & Xu, M.C. (2018). On the signature of complex system: a decomposed approach. European Journal of Operational Research 265(3): 1115–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, G.F. & Hu, T.Z. (2013). On bivariate signatures for systems with independent modules. In Li, H.J. & Li, X.H. (eds), Stochastic orders in reliability and risk. New York: Springer, pp. 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, G.F., Xia, L.Y., & Hu, T.Z. (2014). On computing signatures of k-out-of-n systems consisting of modules. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 16(1): 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, G.F., Xu, M.C., & Chan, P.S. (2018). An efficient algorithm for computing the signatures of systems with exchangeable components and applications. IISE Transactions 50(7): 584–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Costa Bueno, V. (2013). A multistate monotone system signature. Statistics and Probability Letters 83(11): 2583–2591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eryilmaz, S. & Tuncel, A. (2015). Computing the signature of a generalized k-out-of-n system. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 64(2): 766–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eryilmaz, S. & Tuncel, A. (2016). Generalizing the survival signature to unrepairable homogeneous multi-state systems. Naval Research Logistics 63(8): 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franko, C. & Yalcin, F. (2017). Signatures of series and parallel systems consisting of non disjoint modules. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 46(23): 11425–11439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsbakh, I. & Shpungin, Y. (2012). Stochastic models of network survivability. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 9(1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsbakh, I., Shpungin, Y., & Spizzichino, F. (2011). Signatures of coherent systems built with separate modules. Journal of Applied Probability 48(3): 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsbakh, I., Shpungin, Y., & Spizzichino, F. (2012). Two-dimensional signatures. Journal of Applied Probability 49(2): 416–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertsbakh, I., Shpungin, Y., & Vaisman, R. (2016). D-spectrum and reliability of a binary system with ternary components. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 30(1): 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, X.J., Shen, J.Y., Xu, F.Q., Ma, R.H., & Song, X.Y. (2019). Modular decomposition signature for systems with sequential failure effect. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 189: 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochar, S., Mukerjee, H., & Samaniego, F.J. (1999). The “signature” of a coherent system and its application to comparisons among systems. Naval Research Logistics 46(5): 507–523.3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, G., Gertsbakh, I., & Shpungin, Y. (2011). Evaluating the damage associated with intentional network disintegration. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96(4): 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marichal, J.L. (2015). Algorithms and formulae for conversion between system signatures and reliability functions. Journal of Applied Probability 52(2): 490–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marichal, J.L., Mathonet, P., & Spizzichino, F. (2015). On modular decompositions of system signatures. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 134: 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. & Rubio, R. (2010). Computations of signatures of coherent systems with five components. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 39(1): 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Ruiz, J.M., & Sandoval, C.J. (2005). A note on comparisons among coherent systems with dependent components using signatures. Statistics and Probability Letters 72(2): 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Ruiz, J.M., & Sandoval, C.J. (2007). Properties of coherent systems with dependent components. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 36: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F.J., & Balakrishnan, N. (2013). Mixture representations for the joint distribution of lifetimes of two coherent systems with shared components. Advances in Applied Probability 45(4): 1011–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Samaniego, F.J., Balakrishnan, N., & Bhattacharya, D. (2008). On the application and extension of system signatures in engineering reliability. Naval Research Logistics 55(4): 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, S., Löfstrand, M., & Andrews, J. (2019). An efficient algorithm for computing exact system and survival signatures of K-terminal network reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 185: 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. (1985). On closure of the IFR class under formation of coherent systems. IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-34(1): 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J. (2007). System signatures and their applications in engineering reliability. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samaniego, F.J., Balakrishnan, N., & Navarro, J. (2009). Dynamic signatures and their use in comparing the reliability of new and used systems. Naval Research Logistics 56(6): 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllou, I.S. & Koutras, M.V. (2008). On the signature of coherent systems and applications. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 22(1): 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, H., Balakrishnan, N., & Cui, L.R. (2020). On the multi-state signatures of ordered system lifetimes. Advances in Applied Probability 52(1): 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, H., Balakrishnan, N., & Cui, L.R. (2020). Comparisons of multi-state systems with binary-state components of different sizes. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability to appear, doi:10.1007/s11009-020-09805-x.Google Scholar
Yi, H. & Cui, L.R. (2018). A new computation method for signature: Markov process method. Naval Research Logistics 65(5): 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, H., Cui, L.R., & Balakrishnan, N. (2021). Computation of survival signatures for multi-state consecutive-k systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 208: 107429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarezadeh, S., Asadi, M., & Eftekhar, S. (2019). Signature-based information measures of multi-state networks. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 33(3): 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar