Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-01T02:13:52.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Kenneth Keith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Kenneth Keith
Kenneth Keith*
Affiliation:
International Court of Justice
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Future of Alien Tort Litigation: Kiobel and Beyond
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 106 , 2012 , pp. 487 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Friendly, Henry J., Benchmarks: Selected Papers by an Eminent Federal Judge 196, 202 (1967)Google Scholar.

2 I would mention in that context another splendid publication by the Hudson medalist of yesterday, James Crawford, entitled Australian Courts of Law.

3 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

4 11 U.S. 116(1812).

5 Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Ger. v. It.; Greece intervening), Judgment, (Feb. 3, 2012), available at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/143/16883.pdf.

6 Id. para. 52.

7 Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosn. & Herz. v. Serb. & Montenegro), 2007 I.C.J. 43, paras. 170-74 (Feb. 26).

8 R v Maf art & Prieur, 74 ILR 241; UN Secretary-General, Ruling on the Rainbow Warrior Affair Between France and New Zealand (July 6, 1986), 19 R.I.A.A. 199 (1986), 26 I.L.M. 1346; Case Concerning the Difference Between New Zealand and France Concerning the Interpretation or Application of Two Agreements, Concluded on 9 July 1986 Between the Two States and Which Related to the Problems Arising from the Rainbow Warrior Affair (N.Z. v. Fr.), 20 R.I.A.A. 216 (1990).

9 156 Recueil des Cours 1 (1984), referring to his lectures of 20 years earlier.

10 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).

11 United States v. Smith, 18 U.S. 153 (1820) (showing a divided Supreme Court on the (non) specificity ofthat definition).