Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T12:51:24.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal Civil Jurisdiction: Is it Legal? Is it Desirable?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Menno T. Kamminga
Menno T. Kamminga*
Affiliation:
Maastricht University Maastricht Centre for Human Rights
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Universal Civil Jurisdiction—The Next Frontier?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 99 , 2005 , pp. 123 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 21 ILM (1982) 891.

2 35 ILM (1996) 397.

3 It should not be assumed, however, that the commission was speaking for the European Community as a whole. In their joint amicus brief in this case Australia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom took a more restrictive position and argued that the exercise of universal civil jurisdiction was inconsistent with international law.

4 For an opposing view, see Stephens, Beth, Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations, 27 Yale J. of Int'l Law 1 (2002)Google Scholar