Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T12:38:09.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Favor of the Motion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2018

Ben Juratowitch QC
Ben Juratowitch QC*
Affiliation:
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

International courts and tribunals having compulsory jurisdiction over disputes between states is more important than ever. As the theme indicates, it is the way that David and Goliath are placed on an equal footing for the purposes of the resolution of a legal dispute between them.

Type
Debate: Compulsory Jurisdiction in International Dispute Settlement: Beyond David Versus Goliath?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 111 , 2017 , pp. 129 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © by The American Society of International Law 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chagos Marine Protected Area (Mauritius v. U.K.), P.C.A. No. 2011-03, Award of March 18, 2015, paras. 7, 13.

2 Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Gr. v. U.K.), Dissenting Opinion by M. Moore, 1924 PCIJ (ser. A) No. 2, at 60 (Aug. 30).