Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T06:52:52.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Investment treaties, as we know, grant foreign investors certain substantive rights as well as direct remedies for enforcement, in particular access to international arbitration. Yet these rights and remedies are not granted to an investor in a vacuum. They often exist alongside rights under domestic law and contractual regimes. Moreover, when a foreign investment is made through a multilevel corporate structure—as is common—various entities in the chain may have rights under different investment treaties.

Type
Debate: This House Believes that Parallel Proceedings in Investment Arbitration are Abusive and Should be Banned
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 115 , 2021 , pp. 97 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This session was convened at 1:45 p.m., March 24, 2001, by its moderator, Lindsay Gastrell of Arbitration Chambers, who introduced the speakers: Mariam Gotsiridze of the Ministry of Justice of Georgia; Caline Mouawad of Chaffetz Lindsey LLP; Professor Pierre Mayer of the University of Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne; Professor Jan Paulsson; and Sam Wordsworth QC of Essex Court Chambers.