Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T02:24:45.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Shruti Rana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2022

Shruti Rana
Shruti Rana*
Affiliation:
Assistant Dean for Curricular and Undergraduate Affairs, Professor, International Law and Director, International Law and Institutions Program, Hamilton Lugar School of Global and International Studies, Indiana University Bloomington.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We find ourselves today poised on the edge of a moment of transition. As the traditional structures and institutions of the post-World War II global legal order weaken or fall around us, international lawyers have been questioning whether what we are witnessing is merely a cyclical downturn in the strength and utility of the international legal order, that is, just another periodic adjustment or ebb from the high-water mark of the 1990s—or whether we are instead witnessing the messy and painful collapse of one order and the bloody birth of another.

Type
Backlash to the international legal order: breakdown or breakthrough?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 115 , 2021 , pp. 249 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The collaborators on the multi-year Navigating the Backlash to Global Law and Institutions project (funded by a grant from Australian National University, Global Research Partnership Scheme) are Peter Danchin, Jeremy Farrall, Jo Ford, Shruti Rana, and Imogen Saunders.

2 See Peter Danchin, Jeremy Farrall, Shruti Rana & Imogen Saunders, The Pandemic Paradox in International Law, 114 AJIL 598 (2020).