Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T07:47:42.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sovereign Equality and “Bounded Pluralism” in the International Legal Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Brad R. Roth
Brad R. Roth*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Sovereignty: Essential, Variegated, Or Irrelevant?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 99 , 2005 , pp. 392 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 G.A. Res. 2625, Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, U.N. GAOR, 25th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/ 8082 (1970).

2 See generally Roth, Brad R., Governmental Illegitimacy in Internation al Law 136 –49 160 –71 253 –354(1999).Google Scholar

1 Reisman, W. Michael, Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law 84 AJIL 866 875 (1990)Google Scholar.

4 Reisman, W. Michael, Why Regime Change Is (Almost Always) a Bad Idea 98 AJIL 516–17 516 (2004). (“ Our international legal system is scarcely imaginable without” territorial communities having the right to govern themselves “without interference … . [S]tate sovereignty prevails in all but the most egregious instances of widespread human rights violations … .”)Google Scholar