Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:17:02.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane production by sheep when fed either untreated, ammonia treated or sodium hydroxide treated straw

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

A R Moss  and
D I Givens
A R Moss
Affiliation:
ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit, Stratford on Avon, CV37 9RQ, UK
D I Givens
Affiliation:
ADAS Feed Evaluation Unit, Stratford on Avon, CV37 9RQ, UK
Get access

Extract

In recent years considerable attention has been given to Improving the feeding value of low-quality roughages through physiological, biological and chemical processes (Jackson, 1978). Many reviews of chemical treatment methods on the effect of digestibility have previously been undertaken by Homb (1984), Sundstøl (1984) and Wanapat et al (1985), but few have studied the effect on methane production. The values available are very variable. Since the importance of chemically upgrading low-quality forages is also increasing in developing countries, it is essential to investigate further the effect chemical upgrading has on methane production, in order to estimate its impact on global warming.

Type
Rumen Metabolism
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1992 , March 1992 , pp. 204
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaxter, K L and Clapperton, J L (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 511.Google Scholar
Givens, D I, Adamson, A H and Cobby, J M (1988). Anim. Feed Sc1. Technol. 19: 173–184.Google Scholar
Homb, T (1984). In: Straw and Other By-products as feed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 106–126.Google Scholar
Jackson, M G (1978). World Anim. Rev., 28: 38–43.Google Scholar
Moss, A R, Givens, D I and Eveington, J M (1990). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 29: 73–87.Google Scholar
Sundstøl, F (1984). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10: 173–187.Google Scholar
Wanapat, M, Sundstøl, F and Garmo, T H (1985). Anim. Feed Sci. Techol. 12: 195–309.Google Scholar