No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2017
It has been suggested (Kyriazakis and Emmans, 1992a, b) that the material efficiency with which the pig can retain protein (ep), is directly proportional to the energy:protein ratio of the diet (R), so that ep = k.R. This hypothesis accounts for the finding that the rate of protein deposition can sometimes be increased by increasing the energy supply at a constant rate of protein supply.
It is also possible that the constant of proportionality, k, is a genetic variable, although it was proposed, partly for the sake of simplicity, that there would be no genetic effects on the value of k. To test the propositions: (i) that ep is proportional to R, and (ii) that k does not differ between genotypes, an experiment was designed and carried out on two pig breeds which were expected to be very different from each other.