Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T10:28:41.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nutritive value of some greek browsing species as affected by maturity and antinutritive compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

X. Markantonatos ,
K. Khazaal  and
E.R Ørskov
X. Markantonatos
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, Scotland, UK
K. Khazaal
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, Scotland, UK
E.R Ørskov
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB, Scotland, UK
Get access

Extract

Chemical components of plants vary between species and with maturity. As a result the nutritive value could be affected. Antinutritive factors such as tannins are common in browse. Little is known about mediterranean browse. This paper aimed to study chemical composition and to determine the nutritive value using the in vitrogas production and the in sacco DM degradation techniques of 8 Greek browse at different stages of growth.

Type
Tropical Forages
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1993: Winter meeting , March 1993 , pp. 201
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broadhurst, R.B. and Jones, W.T. (1978). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29: 788–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. and Boyne, A.W. (1970). Analyst. 96: 181–193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.G. (1970). Forage analysis. Agriculture Handbook 379. USDA.Google Scholar
Julkunen-Tiitto, R. (1985). Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 33: 213–217.Google Scholar
Makkar, H. et al. (1992). Proceeding of the XVIth International Conference of Groupe Polyphenol, Lisboa, Portugal (July)Google Scholar
McDonald, I. (1981). J. Agric. Sci. Comb. 96: 251–252.Google Scholar
Menke, K.H.and Steingass, H. (1988). Animal Research and Development. Vol 28: 7–55.Google Scholar
Morrison, I.M. (1972). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 23: 455–463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, L.J., Hrstich, L.N. and Chan, B.G. (1986). Phytochemistry. 25: 223–230.Google Scholar