Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:52:00.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AN MBSE-BASED APPROACH FOR THE DEFINITION AND EVALUATION OF ENGINEERING IT ARCHITECTURES

Part of: Systems Engineering and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

J. Heihoff-Schwede ,
L. Kaiser  and
R. Dumitrescu
J. Heihoff-Schwede*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
L. Kaiser
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
R. Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer IEM, Germany
*
*joerg.heihoff-schwede@iem.fraunhofer.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As the complexity of the systems increases, so does the complexity of designing a suitable engineering IT architecture. Challenges reach from the definition of required and consistent functionalities and interfaces to the evaluation, which combination of IT tools fulfils the required functionality, usability and interoperability in the best way. Thus, we provide a procedure, methodology and modelling support for the definition of functional and logical engineering IT architectures and their holistic evaluation. The approach is part of an overall procedure and demonstrated in an example.

Keywords

engineering ITarchitectural designdesign evaluationmodellingsystems engineering (SE)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2285 - 2294
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Abramovici, M. (2018), Engineering smarter Produkte und Services, Plattform Industrie 4.0 STUDIE, acatech - Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Alvarez-Rodríguez, J.M., Zuñiga, R.M. and Llorens, J. (2019), “Elevating the meaning of data and operations within the development lifecycle through an interoperable toolchain”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2019.00652.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, M. et al. (2012), Evaluation of the openness of automation tools for interoperability in engineering tool chains, IEEE 17th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2012.6489542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, W., Herkommer, O. and Schlund, S. (2015), “Die Digitalisierung der Wertschöpfung kommt in deutschen Unternehmen an: Industrie 4.0 wird unsere Arbeit verändern”, Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 110 No. 1-2, pp. 68–73. https://doi.org/10.3139/104.111273Google Scholar
Becker, J., Rosemann, M. and Schütte, R. (1995), “Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Modellierung”, Wirtschafts-informatik, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 435–445.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. et al. (2014), “Model Lifecycle Management for MBSE”, INCOSE International Symposium, Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 30-July 3, 2014, INCOSE, San Diego, Vol. 24, pp. 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2014.tb03145.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedenthal, S., Moore, A. and Steiner, R. (2012), A Practical Guide to SysML - The Systems Modeling Language, Morgan Kaufmann, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-66331-0Google Scholar
Friedland, B. et al. (2017), “Conducting a Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Trade Study Using a Systems Engineering Approach”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2017.00414.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, B., Malone, R. and Herrold, J. (2016), “Systems Engineering a Model Based Systems Engineering Tool Suite: The Boeing Approach”, INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00167.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J. et al. (2013), Systems Engineering in industrial practice, Heinz Nixdorf Institut, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany.Google Scholar
Gausemeier, J. and Plass, C. (2014), Zukunftsorientierte Unternehmensgestaltung, Carl Hanser, München. https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446438422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graner, M. (2013), Der Einsatz von Methoden in Produktentwicklungsprojekten: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Rahmenbedingungen und Auswirkungen, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01278-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heihoff-Schwede, J., Kaiser, L. and Dumitrescu, R. (2019a), “An MBSE-based approach for the functional analysis of engineering IT architectures”, Tag des Systems Engineering, München, 6.-8. November, 2019, Gesellschaft für Systems Engineering, BremenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heihoff-Schwede, J., Kaiser, L. and Dumitrescu, R. (2019), “An MBSE-based approach for the analysis of requirements towards engineering IT architectures”, Proceedings of the 5th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, Scottland, UK, October 1-3, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE46696.2019.8984568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, J. and Heimes, P. (2018), “Informationssystem-Architekturen produzierender Unternehmen für die Digitalisierung gestalten”, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Vol. 55 No. 5, pp. 984–1005. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-0440-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holligan, C., Hargaden, V. and Papakostas, N. (2017), “Product lifecycle management and digital manufacturing technologies in the era of cloud computing”, 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Madeira, Portugal, June 27-29, 2017, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, T. et al. (2018), “Model-based Process Engineering - An approach to integrated product system and process modelling”, INCOSE EMEASEC/GfSE TdSE 2018, Berlin, Germany, November 5-7, 2018.Google Scholar
IEC. (2010), IEC61508: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 3: Software requirements, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.Google Scholar
ISO. (2006), ISO 9241-110:2006: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: Dialogue principles, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
ISO. (2011), ISO/IEC 25010:2011: Systems and software engineering - Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - System and software quality models, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
ISO. (2015), ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 International Standard - Systems and software engineering - System life cycle processes, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Lu, J. (2019), A Framework for Cyber-physical System Tool-chain Development: A Service-oriented and Model-based Systems Engineering Approach, [PhD Thesis], KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Pedersen, K. et al. (2000), “Validating Design Methods & Research: The Validation Square”, Proceedings of DETC ‘00, 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 10-14, 2000, Baltimore, MD, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
Schütte, R. and Vering, O. (2011), Erfolgreiche Geschäftsprozesse durch moderne Warenwirtschaftssysteme - Produktübersicht marktführender Systeme und Auswahlprozess, Springer Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20523-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J. (2015), Product Lifecycle Management (Volume 1) - 21st Century Paradigm for Product Realisation, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17440-2Google Scholar
The Open Group. (2018), The Open Group Architecture Framework - Version 9.2.Google Scholar
Törngren, M. and Grogan, P.T. (2018), “How to Deal with the Complexity of Future Cyber-Physical Systems?”, Designs, Vol. 2 No. 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs2040040Google Scholar
Zangemeister, C. (1976), Nutzwertanalyse in der Systemtechnik, Wittemann, Munich.Google Scholar
Zwicky, F. (1969), Discovery, invention, research through the morphological approach, Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3873.1317Google Scholar