Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:17:08.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA AND PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE DATA SIMULATION IN CONCEPT SELECTION

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. Y. Kwok ,
J. Schulte  and
S. I. Hallstedt
S. Y. Kwok*
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
J. Schulte
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
S. I. Hallstedt
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
*
*sze.yin.kwok@bth.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Companies struggle with identifying relevant sustainability aspects strategically, assessing alternative solutions quantitatively, and making trade-offs. This paper reports results from a prescriptive study with an aerospace company, and presents the Sustainability Criteria And product life-cycle Data Simulation (SCADS) approach. Based on strategic integration of sustainability indicators, this approach aims to enable visualisation and comparison of the sustainability implications of different concepts in early design phases of product development.

Keywords

sustainable designearly design phasesimulation-based designmodel-driven developmentindicators
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1979 - 1988
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahmad, S. et al. (2018), “Sustainable product design and development: A review of tools, applications and research prospects”, Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, Vol. 132 No. October 2017, pp. 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autodesk Inc. (2019), “Eco Materials Adviser”, Autodesk App Store, available at: https://apps.autodesk.com/INVNTOR/en/Detail/Index?id=8391666263963684768&appLang=en&os=Win64 (accessed 1 October 2019).Google Scholar
Bertoni, A. et al. (2018a), “Model-based decision support for value and sustainability assessment: applying machine learning in aerospace product development”, Proceedings of the DESIGN, 2018, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 2585–2596. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A. and Isaksson, O. (2018b), “EVOKE: A Value-Driven Concept Selection Method for Early System Design”, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 46–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-016-5324-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoni, M. et al. (2019), “Life cycle simulation to support cross-disciplinary decision making in early PSS design”, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 83, pp. 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blessing, L. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer, London, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovea, M.D. and Pérez-Belis, V. (2012), “A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broman, G. et al. (2017), “Science in support of systematic leadership towards sustainability”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byggeth, S. and Hochschorner, E. (2006), “Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 14 No. 15-16, pp. 1420–1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, M.-C. and Chu, C.-H. (2012), “Review of sustainable product design from life cycle perspectives”, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 13 No. 7, pp. 1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0169-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, B., Leduc, R. and Savard, L. (2012), “From a conventional to a sustainable engineering design process: different shades of sustainability”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2010.516246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaziulusoy, A.İ., Boyle, C. and McDowall, R. (2013), “System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 45, pp. 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. (2017), “Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. and Isaksson, O. (2017), “Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 161, pp. 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallstedt, S.I. and Nylander, J.W. (2019), “Sustainability Research Implementation in Product Development - Learnings from a Longitudinal Study”, Proceedings of the Design Society: ICED, Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, pp. 3381–3390. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.345Google Scholar
Held, M. et al. (2018), “Current challenges for sustainable product development in the German automotive sector: A survey based status assessment”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 195, pp. 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksson, O. et al. (2015), “Model based decision support for value and sustainability in product development”, Proceedings of the Design Society: ICED, Vol. 1, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Jaghbeer, Y. et al. (2017), “Exploration of Simulation-Driven Support Tools for Sustainable Product Development”, Procedia CIRP, The Author(s), Vol. 64, pp. 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwok, S.Y. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2018), “Towards Strategic Sustainable Product Development: Challenges and Opportunities for Communicating Sustainability in a Value Chain”, Norddesign 2018 Conference, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
McAloone, T.C. and Tan, A.R. (2005), “Sustainable product development through a life-cycle approach to product and service creation: An exploration of the extended responsibilities and possibilities for product developers”, Proceedings of Eco-X Conference: Ecology and Economy in Electronix, KERP, Vienna, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
McKay, J. and Marshall, P. (2001), “The dual imperatives of action research”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110384771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Y.B. (2017), “Simulation modelling for sustainability: a review of the literature”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2016.1220990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöggl, J.-P., Baumgartner, R.J. and Hofer, D. (2017), “Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 140, pp. 1602–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, J. and Hallstedt, S. (2017), “Challenges and preconditions to build capabilities for sustainable product design”, Proceedings of the Design Society: ICED.Google Scholar
Schulte, J. and Hallstedt, S. (2018), “Company Risk Management in Light of the Sustainability Transition”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 11, pp. 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SolidWorks, . (2019), “SolidWorks Sustainability”, available at: https://www.solidworks.com/sustainability/ (accessed 1 October 2019).Google Scholar
United Nations. (2015), Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Sustainable Knowledge Platform, Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015.Google Scholar
Watz, M. and Hallstedt, S.I. (2018), “Integrating Sustainability in Product Requirements”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018, Vol. 3, The Design Society, Glasgow, pp. 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0377CrossRefGoogle Scholar